Comments Thread For: Shakur Stevenson Warns Devin Haney: I Always Got The Best of Him, Tell Him 'Come On!'

[joseph5620]

https://www.essentiallysports.com/bo...earthed-video/

Don't know all the circumstances, so I'm not judging one way or another, but here you go.

If you don't know the circumstances you shouldn't comment on it. If you're not judging you shouldn't continue perpetuating a lie when a simple video answers your question.

He's clearly not hitting girls. It's easy to see that. You obviously didn't even at look at the video.

[crimsonfalcon07]

If you don't know the circumstances you shouldn't comment on it. If you're not judging you shouldn't continue perpetuating a lie when a simple video answers your question.

He's clearly not hitting girls. It's easy to see that.

I'm not perpetuating a lie at all. I didn't bring it up to begin with. You asked where the other poster got this, and it was very likely from this event. I don't care one way or another because I didn't look into the circumstances, and I'm not judging him without doing so. You asked for the source, and this was probably the source. Maybe pay attention to who you respond to next time.

Not to mention, the article says things like "The videotape showed Stevenson wearing black pants and a long-sleeve T-shirt, hitting a lady on the back of her head." And also "the video displayed the WBO junior lightweight titleholder, unloading a flurry of punches on a lady and a man." Kinda at odds with your interpretation.

[joseph5620]

I'm not perpetuating a lie at all. I didn't bring it up to begin with. You asked where the other poster got this, and it was very likely from this event. I don't care one way or another because I didn't look into the circumstances, and I'm not judging him without doing so. You asked for the source, and this was probably the source. Maybe pay attention to who you respond to next time.

Not to mention, the article says things like "The videotape showed Stevenson wearing black pants and a long-sleeve T-shirt, hitting a lady on the back of her head." And also "the video displayed the WBO junior lightweight titleholder, unloading a flurry of punches on a lady and a man." Kinda at odds with your interpretation.

I didn't ask you anything. My post was not directed towards you. You chose to get involved on your own. So that's a lie. The other poster can answer for himself. Why are you trying to answer for him if none of this matters to you?

The video speaks for itself. He wasn't hitting females. So there is nothing else to discuss on that topic. It doesn't matter what you read when a video gives you the clear answer. If you claim the video shows something that it clearly doesn't then you're lying.

[crimsonfalcon07]

I didn't ask you anything. My post was not directed towards you. You chose to get involved on your own. So that's a lie. The other poster can answer for himself. Why are you trying to answer for him if none of this matters to you?

The video speaks for itself. He wasn't hitting females. So there is nothing else to discuss on that topic. It doesn't matter what you read when a video gives you the clear answer. If you claim the video shows something that it clearly doesn't then you're lying.

Video clearly shows him punching the girl in white pants in the head at 0:07. Her head snaps back and everything.



The guy in the white hoodie that he primarily fought isn't anywhere near at this point and you can see her head pop back from the punch as it lands.
Not to mention having looked into it, he and his friend instigated the whole thing. He got away with probation and a misdemeanor because he's high profile. I didn't watch it at first, because I was just answering the question posed about where the other poster got it. Not sure why you went immediately to ad hominem attacks. I guess you're just that insecure about being proven wrong.

[joseph5620]

Video clearly shows him punching the girl in white pants in the head at 0:07. Her head snaps back and everything.



The guy in the white hoodie that he primarily fought isn't anywhere near at this point and you can see her head pop back from the punch as it lands.
Not to mention having looked into it, he and his friend instigated the whole thing. He got away with probation and a misdemeanor because he's high profile. I didn't watch it at first, because I was just answering the question posed about where the other poster got it. Not sure why you went immediately to ad hominem attacks. I guess you're just that insecure about being proven wrong.

Stopped reading after that. This topic clearly matters to you so you can stop lying about that. You have an agenda so you can stop pretending that you're an objective observer. You're a phony and your approach is cowardly. Just be real.


Stevenson clearly didn't hit any females and it's clear to see in the video. That's the end of that story. But you can continue to lie about it and pretend that "none of this matters to you" LOL. That's my last response to you. Lie away

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Haney has never had a history of ducking anyone. Everyone has had a history of ducking him, So I don't know. In any case, we shall see though.

He won’t fight Shakur. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if he does though.

[champion4ever]

Shakur is far too risky/good for Haney to consider fighting, he’ll go to 140 after Loma I think.

Haney has never had a history of ducking anyone. Everyone has had a history of ducking him, So I don't know. In any case, we shall see though.

[crimsonfalcon07]

Stopped reading after that. This topic clearly matters to you so you can stop lying about that. You have an agenda so you can stop pretending that you're an objective observer. You're a phony and your approach is cowardly. Just be real.


Stevenson clearly didn't hit any females and it's clear to see in the video. That's the end of that story. But you can continue to lie about it and pretend that "none of this matters to you" LOL. That's my last response to you. Lie away

What's the agenda? I told you from the beginning that I was answering the question you posed. You said it didn't happen. I didn't watch the video at first, just did some of the legwork for you, which was trivial to accomplish, but you apparently suck at looking things up. But if you're going to accuse other people of lying, you should at least be sure there weren't any incidents.

Since you decided to double down on your douchebaggery by also accusing me of lying, I actually looked into the incident. And the court records also show that he and his friend instigated the incident, starting off by making sexual comments to the two women. Shakur threw the first punch too. He was legally convicted of the crime and has a confession on file.

And you clearly didn't watch it closely. I've even got a screenshot in here of him punching the girl in the head.

Just because you have failed repeatedly to do your due diligence doesn't say anything about anyone else's "agenda." Just shows your own emotional immaturity, as does your repeated turns to ad hominem attacks instead of evidence.

[uniquehump]

Yeah because people love saying "wow those guys sure put on a chess match. Glad they jabbed each other for 12 rounds. They can definitely fight tomorrow since they were very hesitant tonight".

It's a hurt sport bro. Fans wanna see them put it on the line. Show fire, show a will to win. I'm definitely watching but definitely not gonna recommend it to a casual fan

Speak for yourself. I'm a fan of the chess match, not Rock'em Sock'em Robots

[Teetotaler69]

Speak for yourself. I'm a fan of the chess match, not Rock'em Sock'em Robots

It's not black and white fool. Doesn't have to be boxing or brawling. You completely missed the point