Take away the baised commentators and Marquez didn't do so bad

[loui_ludwig]

At least Hatton tried to fight his fight, while JMM wasn't.

PBF was outjabbing him. Even though the weight slowed down JMM, PFB still DESERVED the credit of the win over JMM.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

accusing me of being a biased Mexican?

When Did I said you where mexican? Post the link please!!!

I said you be a bit bias tors mexican fighters, because you tend to like them more or thats how it looks like!!!

get your **** together!!!!!!!!


And even if I accuse you of being bias or Mexican, thats not trolling!!!!!!

[Steak]

well, I guess Marquez didnt do too bad considering what he was up against...but thats not saying much.

He might have done a little better than Hatton. Although I had Hatton winning one round as opposed to Marquez's 0, Marquez actually did make Mayweather miss with a few of his leads, and did land two flush right hands, which is two more than Hatton landed.

and Hatton did get KOed and got worse and worse as the fight went on...at least Marquez slightly changed the momentum in the middle part of the fight, and went the distance and was fairly steady on his legs other than the knockdown and maybe a part of the 11th round.

really no point in arguing about something like this though, eh?

[warp1432]

I just think the rounds where Marquez visibly rocked him should have gone in his favor.

I know he wasn't all to accurate, but in a fight like Calzaghe vs Hopkins, how do you give Calzaghe a round then?

Mayweather landed clean consistent punches in every round. It wasn't large periods of time where Mayweather wasn't landing like Hopkins was against Calzaghe. Calzaghe Hopkins was close because Hopkins didn't land a million clean punches like Mayweather did against Marquez

This fight wasn't remotely competitive and Mayweather dominated him easy. Marquez did a good job of trying to land stuff, but Mayweather was just too skilled for him.

[them_apples]

Turn off the commentary and don't pay attention to the punch stats and it does look like a slightly more competitive fight. Marquez still lost decisively though, no question about that.

there we go, all i'm saying

I Never had Marquez winning, competitive, yes.

I'm venting my frustration on peoples opinions that are based off of baised commentating.

[S.G.]

Marquez was in it to some degree for periods of the fight but he just didn't win rounds.

[Inthewhitegirls]

All it was was a 1 sided mismatch. Marquez, for all his heart and warrior style didn't win a single round and mostly hit just air. They weren't biased at all.

Not to mention Marquez is physically to small for Mayweather.

[them_apples]

All it was was a 1 sided mismatch. Marquez, for all his heart and warrior style didn't win a single round and mostly hit just air. They weren't biased at all.

how is it not biased when they don't even mutter a word as Marquez lands a big shot?

When they did it was like "ohh, and Mayweather is just sooo good, as he smiles back"

[T-97]

I have to disagree...

JMM showed a lot of heart and toughness, but I had trouble giving him a round, tbh. I expected him to be stopped, but he proved me wrong there. The Hatton fighter was closer on the cards, but Hatton was stopped.... but Hatton won more rounds than JMM...

Also, I gave Cotto 4 or 5 of the first 6...

[We want Floyd]

Marquez didn't do too bad, but Mayweather did more in every round winning almost all of them.

LMAO, "he didn't do too bad". That's because he wasn't doin' sh8t, and Floyd wasn't forcin' the action when it was clear the other man didn't come with anything.

Therefore, the @ss beating should've been alot worse! Put PAC in that same situation against that version of Juanita and I f**kin' guarantee Juanita would've left that ring in a stretcher!

Atleast, Flattened was able to close the distance on Floyd, how many of Floyd's past opponents can say that?