Comments Thread For: Wladimir Klitschko Protests Inclusion of Russian Athletes at 2024 Olympics

[bigtyivier2k2]

As someone who was born in Ukraine but of ***ish roots maybe the Klit should protest all the ****’s and banderas in Ukraine which is one of the most corrupt countries. Where have our billions gone to there? Cause theres no accounting for it.

[alexjust]

IDGAF about who's "defending" themselves or not you clown, doesn't change the fact they're being used as a tool for corporate interests and if you believe otherwise you're a naive fool, it's the new more polite and "less intrusive colonization".

As for you "pseudo-knowledge" comment don't make laugh you imbecile, they do and say this stuff in plain sight, it's not "pseudo-knowledge" in the slightest if you want to remain blind/willfully ignorant then that's your choose.

E.G. World leaders like Boris Johnson actively encouraging Zelensky to NOT engage in peace talks to ensure the ruination of their country, the joining of EU/NATO, ensuring their "rebuild plan succeeds" and and ultimately their complete and utter reliance on the west.

Joe ***** “If Russia invades… then there will be no longer a Nord ****** 2. We will bring an end to it.” and then what happens? "surprisingly" it gets bombed and who's to blame non other than Russia because Russia apparently cut their nose to spite their face...

And let's not forget the Condoleezza's comments I mentioned, good old sleepy Joe was VP whilst she made them comments and his own sons nefarious dealings with Ukraine,China and Russia...

It's so obvious a blind man could see what's occurring...

You upset, hun? Can you throw in a few more quotes to show how well versed you are in the topic? Sleepy Joe? Why am I speaking to MAGA? Also explains the pro-Russian stance. Assets at work

[alexjust]

There is no point in arguing with tinfoils. They don't argue based on facts or proof but beliefs. And you cannot prove beliefs wrong. It's a complete waste of time as frustrating it is to see people be smug about repeating obvious and weak ruski propaganda. It's just so sad that in this day and age when you have infinite amounts of information available to you so many people are wilfully and proudly ignorant and yet they act as if ignorance should valued as high as knowledge and wisdom.

They pick whatever information supporting their view, cut comments out of context and then formulate a pseudo evidential picture that is nothing but a silly oversimplification.

It is so sad that people are like "Ha! this politician is corrupt so I ain't buying their lies!! Lemme go buy *****'s lies instead because he is saying the opposite so it has to be true!"

Somehow I though anyone living in the west would be smart enough to see through obvious lies from Russia but no. I thought ppl like Chinese, North Koreans and Russians were just used to being lied to and controlled but apparently even people living in the free world want to buy lies coming from a totalitarian tyrant.

And attack a man who has shown heart in the sport they love plus he has stayed and defended his country from an aggressor for a year. Wlad is a champ in the ring and outside of it too. And these people attack him while defending a mass murdering tyrant bcs "sports should not be mixed with politics" which is laughable. What do these people think sports are if not politics lol. You can't separate the two no matter what.

No disagreement there. I like boxing despite its fans. But the concentration of idiots on this site make me lose faith in humanity

[letsgochump]

It's not a "narrative" you simpleton, as I've pointed numerous time they aren't hiding their plans you imbecile.

They outline their intentions in places like the IMF, WEF, EU Parliament so on so forth.

As for your idiotic statement to me about politics and sports, I never mentioned them being disconnected you fool.

I said people don't care about their "sports person/clubs" political tripe.

They'd much rather they keep that shít to themselves, I respect Wlad as an athlete/boxer IDGAF about his political/religious opinions or home life and I KNOW many others are in the same boat...

Your inability to comprehend that and then and act high and mighty is beyond laughable to me, they only person displaying ignorance throughout this exchange has been you my friend.

You mention access to information, yet refuse to look to said information other than ones that align with your viewpoint, you read my post and don't even fully comprehend what's been said yet you reply just to spew rhetoric and do such in a condescending and immature manner.

As for your "trailer park comment" don't know why you felt the need to mention your lifestyle to me, i'm not concerned with your welfare collecting self.

What do you know about the info I have looked at? I have actually gone and had the debate with your kind probably more times than I remember and it always and I mean always ends up with "go look it up yourself" when we start looking at actual evidence that, surprise surprise, doesn't hold up. FYI you think you're way smarter than you are.

Besides there is nothing to debate here: you think ***** is attractive, I don't. End of.

[Boro]

What do you know about the info I have looked at? I have actually gone and had the debate with your kind probably more times than I remember and it always and I mean always ends up with "go look it up yourself" when we start looking at actual evidence that, surprise surprise, doesn't hold up. FYI you think you're way smarter than you are.

Besides there is nothing to debate here: you think ***** is attractive, I don't. End of.

I didn't tell you to look anything up sweetheart, I said you don't look at all the available information, again you're inability to comprehend what's being said and your lack of understanding of basic English is beyond embarrassing, son.

I don't need to know what information you're looking at or not, it's more than apparent you don't look at "information" that's widely available or every aspect of conflicts and their preceding events and the people involved with said events...

Like I said condelezza rice and her "Russian vulnerability" was on the national news as was *****'s "we'll destroy nord ****** 2" speech.

Boris Johnson and his we'll help rebuild Ukraine as long as they don't negotiate with *****.

Rishi sunak and his CBDC talks on again national news and then the WEF and IMF openly discussing how they'll use Ukraine as a test bed for fully AI court systems,digital IDs, CBDC and social credit scores after the presentation at URC 2022...

With Larry Fink you know the CEO of Blackrock the very guy Zelensky was inviting to rebuild and restructure Ukraine mentioning the very same.

Stop being naive, I know you love your own little wool wrapped version of the world but peak out for a moment and you'll quickly realise it's not what you think it is...

And lastly because your miserable hominem attacks clearly show you're successfully "winning" the debate right? imbecile, even though this isn't a debate,
for the umpteenth time, it's not "taken out context" as you've previously claimed, it's not "conspiracy theory" and it's not up for debate how can you try and debate what people have been openly saying on live TV...

[removed]

Wlad is a grade A bellend.

[Boro]

You upset, hun? Can you throw in a few more quotes to show how well versed you are in the topic? Sleepy Joe? Why am I speaking to MAGA? Also explains the pro-Russian stance. Assets at work

Upset, LOL thanks for the laugh mate, I called him sleepy joe because I've seen the rétard fall to sleep on TV the few time's I've seen him and practically drooling on himself whilst giving speeches...

I'm not from the US, so your rétarded assumptions about "MAGA" were redundant as well, who's pro Russia like?

Russia could be wiped off the face of the earth for all I care as could Ukraine, I was discussing a war for corporate interests, not Russia or Ukraine like I said previously they're just a cog in the machine in the grand scheme of things...

You two made it about me apparently aligning with Russia but you're gravely mistaken, every Russian man I've meet is a cúnt and quite frankly I doubt the leader of said country is any different.

[letsgochump]

I didn't tell you to look anything up sweetheart, I said you don't look at all the available information, again you're inability to comprehend what's being said and your lack of understanding of basic English is beyond embarrassing, son.

I don't need to know what information you're looking at or not, it's more than apparent you don't look at "information" that's widely available or every aspect of conflicts and their preceding events and the people involved with said events...

Like I said condelezza rice and her "Russian vulnerability" was on the national news as was *****'s "we'll destroy nord ****** 2" speech.

Boris Johnson and his we'll help rebuild Ukraine as long as they don't negotiate with *****.

Rishi sunak and his CBDC talks on again national news and then the WEF and IMF openly discussing how they'll use Ukraine as a test bed for fully AI court systems,digital IDs, CBDC and social credit scores after the presentation at URC 2022...

With Larry Fink you know the CEO of Blackrock the very guy Zelensky was inviting to rebuild and restructure Ukraine mentioning the very same.

Stop being naive, I know you love your own little wool wrapped version of the world but peak out for a moment and you'll quickly realise it's not what you think it is...

And lastly because your miserable hominem attacks clearly show you're successfully "winning" the debate right? imbecile, even though this isn't a debate,
for the umpteenth time, it's not "taken out context" as you've previously claimed, it's not "conspiracy theory" and it's not up for debate how can you try and debate what people have been openly saying on live TV...

Do you want to get embarassed? It's fine by me but this convo with tinfoils ends two ways: you either end up telling me I need to find the proof for what YOU are saying myself or you admit you have no proof for your position.

You said: "You mention access to information, yet refuse to look to said information other than ones that align with your viewpoint" So tell me how do you know what information I have looked at?

[Boro]

Do you want to get embarassed? It's fine by me but this convo with tinfoils ends two ways: you either end up telling me I need to find the proof for what YOU are saying myself or you admit you have no proof for your position.

You said: "You mention access to information, yet refuse to look to said information other than ones that align with your viewpoint" So tell me how do you know what information I have looked at?

Well you can't even spell embarrassed, so the odds of me being embarrassed by you are slim to none, son.

I don't even need to answer that, the fact you haven't seen any of the aforementioned things I've mentioned clearly indicates you live in an echo chamber.

Or you are willingly ignoring statements made by multiple,multi-national influential people e.g. Condoleezza,*****,Boris, Sunak, Ursula von der Leyen, Larry Fink, Klaus Schwab, Zelensky, *****, Fedorov so on and so forth to reinforce your inherent biases...

[letsgochump]

Well you can't even spell embarrassed, so the odds of me being embarrassed by you are slim to none, son.

I don't even need to answer that, the fact you haven't seen any of the aforementioned things I've mentioned clearly indicates you live in an echo chamber.

Or you are willingly ignoring statements made by multiple,multi-national influential people e.g. Condoleezza,*****,Boris, Sunak, Ursula von der Leyen, Larry Fink, Klaus Schwab, Zelensky, *****, Fedorov so on and so forth to reinforce your inherent biases...

Well there it is! First question asked AND dodged lmao. Can't make this up. But sure, focus on spelling as if that works as a distraction. This is 100% following the script of a conversation with a tinfoil.

You talk big but as soon as one question is asked you tuck tail. Pls enlighten us, what exactly is going on then? What's this war about according to you?