What Errol thinks or wants isn't even relevant, Hayman runs the show so go interview Al Hayman for a change. Again, what Errol thinks doesn't matter...bottom line....Hayman isn't risking a potential lose that will decimate the value of the welterweights he controls .
Crawford, Spence, Charlo are fighters, Haymon isn't a fight fan anymore than he was a music man, Al is a businessman thats about money. The PBC business model is dependent upon belts and filling dates on a network, that's it, that's where Al makes his money. Legacy defining fights are only good if it makes long term money for Al Haymon, not Spence, not Wilder, not Jermal Charlo or any other fighter.
The only difference between Al Hayman and Bob Arum is that one promotes and the other locks fighters into a contracts with a higher percentage and much lower paydays.
Crawford, Spence, Charlo are fighters, Haymon isn't a fight fan anymore than he was a music man, Al is a businessman thats about money. The PBC business model is dependent upon belts and filling dates on a network, that's it, that's where Al makes his money. Legacy defining fights are only good if it makes long term money for Al Haymon, not Spence, not Wilder, not Jermal Charlo or any other fighter.
The only difference between Al Hayman and Bob Arum is that one promotes and the other locks fighters into a contracts with a higher percentage and much lower paydays.
Comment