Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte-Jermaine Franklin Nearly Done Deal For 11/26 At OVO Arena Wembley In London
Collapse
-
Comment
-
And Whyte still took the fight.
Where's the bluff? The WBC were happy to keep Whyte at bay and it took years of legal proceedings to finally get them to make him mandatory.Comment
-
You must think the win for Salvador Sanchez over Nelson meant nothing as he came in at a few day's notice. However, it took him until the 15th and final round to stop him. Why? Is he a bum too?Comment
-
1. He kept refusing eliminators
2. He popped for PEDs when he finally did win an eliminator
3. He got knocked out by a shot fighter after he and his lawyers swept his PED test under the rug
He got backed into a corner by Fury. He was hoping Fury would get frustrated by his nonsense and vacate so that Whyte's ****** fake interim belt would be elevated to a proper title. That's what he wanted all along. He never wanted the Joshua rematch, he never wanted Wilder, and he never wanted Fury.
Dillian Whyte: Make me mandatory
WBC: fight an eliminator
Dillian Whyte: No
WBC: Well, Breazeale already won an eliminator and said he'd risk his mandatory shot against you
Dillian Whyte: No
IBF: Well, you can fight Pulev in an eliminator
Dillian Whyte: No
Joshua: Well, you can challenge for the unified heavyweight championship
Dillian Whyte: No
WBC: Well, you can fight a total bum in an eliminator for an interim title
Dillian Whyte: Okay, but only if I get to use PEDsComment
-
It was two weeks, and Dillian dominated him. That was a Helenius who was 5 years fresher than the one Wilder fought.
You must think the win for Salvador Sanchez over Nelson meant nothing as he came in at a few day's notice. However, it took him until the 15th and final round to stop him. Why? Is he a bum too?
Comment
-
No comment on Sanchaz and his win on a few days notice over Nelson? No comment on it taking 15 rounds to do so? No? OK. You're the one who thought it rational to call fighters bums when winning under these conditions. At least i know the win meant nothing for Whyte. Never said anything to contradict that.Comment
-
The facts say two weeks. Look it up. Look at the dates you idiot.
No comment on Sanchaz and his win on a few days notice over Nelson? No comment on it taking 15 rounds to do so? No? OK. You're the one who thought it rational to call fighters bums when winning under these conditions. At least i know the win meant nothing for Whyte. Never said anything to contradict that.
Comment
-
Because the facts clearly show Helenius was wrong. That's why.
No comment on Sanchaz and his win on a few days notice over Nelson? No comment on it taking 15 rounds to do so? No? OK. You're the one who thought it rational to call fighters bums when winning under these conditions. At least i know the win meant nothing for Whyte. Never said anything to contradict that.Comment
-
Because the facts clearly show Helenius was wrong. That's why.
No comment on Sanchaz and his win on a few days notice over Nelson? No comment on it taking 15 rounds to do so? No? OK. You're the one who thought it rational to call fighters bums when winning under these conditions. At least i know the win meant nothing for Whyte. Never said anything to contradict that.
I didn't comment on Sanchaz because I don't know anyone with that name. Do you mean Sanchez?
Comment
Comment