Tyson Fury better resume than AJ

[TMLT87]

I love how boxing is apparently the only sport that never moves on.

I hear guys claiming that midgets like Marciano would beat Tyson Fury in a boxing fight.

Its kinda like claiming that Jimmy Connors would beat Roger Federer in a tennis match.

Laughable.

Marciano is too far back but I dont think Fury would be on top in the 80s and definitely not the 90s, maybe not even the 00s with Vitali and a younger Wlad.

The main thing that changed about HW boxing is how big the fighters are and how roided they are, and thats been in effect for decades already.

[QueensburyRules]

Give me a shout when Joshua beats a real champion. Charles Martin doesn't count btw.

- - Give a shout when Tygrrl and Deyonce career earnings combined finally match AJ's while consolidating and defending all relevant titles.

Gonna have to happen in some fantasy future circle jack because it ain't got a chance of happening in this era.

[The plunger man]

I nearly spat my coffee out when I read the name Otto wallin in the mix.....grizzly needs to get back in his hibernation cave and let the big boys discuss boxing resumes.
fury is retiring after having one defence and that’s still not certain he wins.....what a goon this grizzly is lol

[Silence]

Marciano is too far back but I dont think Fury would be on top in the 80s and definitely not the 90s, maybe not even the 00s with Vitali and a younger Wlad.

The main thing that changed about HW boxing is how big the fighters are and how roided they are, and thats been in effect for decades already.

Only Lennox Lewis would be problem for Fury in 90s. Vitali would be problem for everyone with his awkward style and physical dimensions. I think only Lewis, Vitali and Holmes would have a chance against Fury prime vs prime. Fury would beat the rest clear.

[Toffee]

Oh we're doing this thread again?

Fury has two big away title wins against long reigning champions. Joshua has more depth, fought his mandatories and went and unified titles.

What you like from that is what you like.

[Ropss]

Oh we're doing this thread again?

Fury has two big away title wins against long reigning champions. Joshua has more depth, fought his mandatories and went and unified titles.

What you like from that is what you like.

Against 40 olds

[Toffee]

Against 40 olds

Compared to "against the least skilled champion in history and one who was dealing with all sorts of personal problems".

As I said, you can pick what you prefer out of the two but facts are facts.

Fury has the two very significant wins. Joshua has unifications, mandatories and the deeper resume.

PIck what you like. It's subjective. But arguing that either of them has no validity is just silly.

[BodyBagz]

Compared to "against the least skilled champion in history and one who was dealing with all sorts of personal problems".

As I said, you can pick what you prefer out of the two but facts are facts.

Fury has the two very significant wins. Joshua has unifications, mandatories and the deeper resume.

PIck what you like. It's subjective. But arguing that either of them has no validity is just silly.

The sad part is, one of them, Wilder, was universally regarded as a one trick pony who only fought bums....BEFORE the fights
NOW he's all that.