Mayweather: "Mosley Beat De La Hoya on Steroids"

[jrosales13]

this interview is OLD as hell, yall talking as if floyd just said this yesterday, this thing is old and done with.

and floyd would stomp on mosley, just like he will stomp on any of yall favorite fighters.. cotto, pacquiao, clottey, margarito whoever yall like will lose to moneymay. the way cotto got his ass whooped vs margarito makes me laugh when people actually think he could beat floyd, who is way more accurate than margarito, he will probably kill cotto (literally). and for yall saying he cheated in that fight, put a sock in it, theres NO proof of that, we ONLY know he cheated vs mosley.

So Floyd should fight all of them right? So he could prove that he can beat all of them.

[daju99]

At least he fought one of da most feared men in boxing in margarito and he kod him. What challenge have u accepted floyd? Overrated n over the hill fighters? Man up punk n fight a real champ!

[Iceta]

If things went smoothly the last couple years for Shane he would have on his 147 lb resume:
Collazo
Cotto
Judah
Margarito
Clottey

Mayweather has got:
Mitchell
Judah
Baldomir
Lol.

And how about that illegal elbow that Floyd keeps using?

[Al Haymon]

Also Oscar and Hatton going into it was considered challenges for Pac. They might of been big fights. But, not a lot of ppl gave Pac a chance at Oscar. Even though everybody knew Oscar was beyond shot. Some fans felt Hatton would of been too strong for Pac. Not a lot but some saw this as a challenge.

Therein lies the dichotomy.

How could Oscar and Hatton be "joke opponents" for Mayweather, but be considered challenges for Pac?

What is the underlying message there?

[DLjunky]

Mayweather does have a point, it seemed like everyone just focused their attention to Margarito when the fight went down.
When really Shane has been a part of a cheating scandal himself.

[tesla_power]

Therein lies the dichotomy.

How could Oscar and Hatton be "joke opponents" for Mayweather, but be considered challenges for Pac?

What is the underlying message there?

That Pac is the naturally smaller man. I know what you want people to say but those are not valid considering the circumstances.

[superchile]

mmmm

i have to agree whit floyd mosleys wins have never been question even whe its been known he was on roids when he beat oscar in their last figth thats a clever way of getting out of a figth whit mosley for floyd

[Al Haymon]

That Pac is the naturally smaller man. I know what you want people to say but those are not valid considering the circumstances.

Right. Pac is the naturally smaller man...and he fought them both at lower weights....right?

Then what is the problem?

FYI ==> Pac is about four pounds smaller than FMJ. And has been for a long time.

[jrosales13]

Therein lies the dichotomy.

How could Oscar and Hatton be "joke opponents" for Mayweather, but be considered challenges for Pac?

What is the underlying message there?

You not looking at the time it happen. You looking at it as Oscar been shot and weight drained and Hatton being overrated and ruined by Mayweater. For the record I gave both Oscar and Hatton little to no chance on beating Maywether and Pac. But, going into the bout I think we both could agree that in the boxing world. Gave little chance to Oscar and Hatton beating Mayweather. The only people that pick Oscar to win were the Mayweather haters who were hoping Oscar won. The only people who picked Hatto to win were Mayweather haters.

The majority and neutral fans and most boxing experts were predicting Mayweather to beat poth. While neutral fans and some boxing experts were saying Oscar was to big for Pac. That Pac wouldn't beat him. Thats the difference here. How can you not see that. With Hatton some were saying that Hatton would be the bigger man. By fight night he would be at the 150's. Some neutral fans and a few experts were giving Hatton a good chance on beating Pac.

Let me throw in Mosley as an example. I think Mosley KO's Pac. I do. While I think Mosley and Mayweather is a 50/50. So I think Mosley would be a big favorite over Pac. While be a slight underdog against Mayweather. So if both beat Mosley. Pac would be looked at a higher light cuz he is defying the odds more. Another example lets say Mayweather and Paul Williams fight Sergio Martinez. I honestly think Martinez is too big for Mayweather. I think he beats Floyd. While I think Williams would be the favorite over Martinez. So if both Floyd and Williams beat Martinez than Floyd would be looking at a higher light than Williams. Cuz by the boxing public he would of defied the odds.

So my point is looking back yes both are overrated wins. But, at the time of the victories it look like Pac is defying the odds more than what Mayweather is. Is just how it is. Is easy to look back now and say those wins don't mean anything but at the time going into fights those wins were huge especially they way he won with ease.

[Al Haymon]

The majority and neutral fans and most boxing experts were predicting Mayweather to beat poth. While neutral fans and some boxing experts were saying Oscar was to big for Pac. That Pac wouldn't beat him. Thats the difference here. How can you not see that. With Hatton some were saying that Hatton would be the bigger man. By fight night he would be at the 150's. Some neutral fans and a few experts were giving Hatton a good chance on beating Pac.

Don't you feel any size disparities were offset at the weights they fought?

Oscar:
May - 154
Pac - 147

Ricky:
May - 147
Pac - 140