He won and more importantly he won his rounds more clearly. Jacobs only landed pity patty jabs and couldn't outbox Ryder. Taylor fight was robbery, Valdez fight was arguably robbery but this wasn't.
Jacobs won the first 6 rounds. I’ve been vocal in my support of John Ryder for years on here but there’s no way you can give him any of the first 6. It was a typical slow start from John. Jacobs wasn’t exactly lighting the world on fire but he was winning those rounds.
It was a close fight but they were bad cards. I’ve watched the fight back and there’s no way you can give John more than 6 rounds.
I noticed refs will step in sooner across the pond
US refs will let a fighter take a longer azz whooping to give him a chance at turning it around
It doesn’t bother me that much. Some are egregious like Froch-Groves 1 for example but I’ve always said I’d rather see a fighter take one shot less than one shot too many if you catch my drift.
Referee’s and judges will inevitably make mistakes, they’re not robots but the biggest problem in British boxing is they’re NEVER held accountable. A lot of these supposed “A star” referee’s and judges need the CJ Ross treatment.
Where have you been the last 30 years? UK judging has always been 95% shi.t. Considering you named yourself RJJ, why do you think he didn't want to fight in the UK when he was hot and undefeated. I'll wait lmao.
In my opinion, peasants should be in the fields, not on the internet.
Comment