Yes, the calculus is this - Fury is more likely to beat Usyk than Joshua is as for as oddsmakers go. So having Joshua step aside and fight the winner of Fury-Usyk is the most favorable path to getting Joshua-Fury for all the belts (and an insane pile of cash) in an all British heavyweight bout.
Problem is, Fury-Usyk is not a huge fight financially and getting together the step aside money for Joshua (and Whyte? depends on which way the wind blows at the WBC office that day) is risky, especially if Fury loses.
It all depends on the Middle East. If the investment actually comes through, then there is a big enough pot to pay step asides and move forward. If not, we get Joshua-Usyk and Fury-Whyte.
Problem is, Fury-Usyk is not a huge fight financially and getting together the step aside money for Joshua (and Whyte? depends on which way the wind blows at the WBC office that day) is risky, especially if Fury loses.
It all depends on the Middle East. If the investment actually comes through, then there is a big enough pot to pay step asides and move forward. If not, we get Joshua-Usyk and Fury-Whyte.

Comment