Dillian Whyte should not just accept 20%. F the WBC

[Brumsongs1]

Fury won his first world title at 20% and came to the fight undefeated having been English, British and European champion. Good luck explaining to him why Dillian Whyte deserves more.

https://www.boxingscene.com/klitschk...uly-6th--92867

[Toffee]

Yes, if you're going to use rule 2.16 modify in favor of the challenger, those are the allowed splits.

But if you're going to modify in favor of the champion, you use rule 2.6, which allows any split the WBC decides on.

They're not equivalents as you keep posting. It's not that 2.6 is for modifications in favour of the champion, while 2.16 is for modifications in favour of the challenger.

Rule 2.16 deals with purse splits and is clear on the splits that they will allow.

2.6 allows them to change everything in their rules when it comes to going to purse bids. That's the rule they're following.

So why even talk about any of their rules when it comes to purse bids? Rule 2.6 covers it all - forget all of the other rules, we've got rule 2.6. In fact why even read that far - rule 1.1 has it covered. They can do whatever they want in any situation.

Personally, if I was repeatedly paying sanctioning fees and expected at least 30% because that's what is in their rules, then I'd be pissed off at the WBC's order. Courts don't tend to take too kindly to 'catch all' clauses either.

[nino brown21]

At least take 30% and ride into the wind with it .

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Listen, if the rules were 80/20 split, fair play, I don't care what they decide as long as they fight - But they're not, and this fight is not exceptional in being one that breaks the rules. It's obvious and evident that the ruling is based on personal matters.

If it was you, you would just accept it? I think not.

Support the fight and stop the WBC.

The WBC are well within their right to impose an 80-20 split. I’d certainly take it.

It makes me laugh how some of you keep defending Dillian Whyte. Let’s look at the facts:
-Rejected TWO eliminator.
-Rejected a direct title shot.
-Failed TWO drug tests.

Now, yet again, he’s refusing to take another title opportunity yet somehow it’s Dillian that’s being treated unfairly. It’s like the boy who cried wolf.

[STREET CLEANER]

I have never seen people so emotionally involved in how much a fighter should make for a fight when it's not even his title. If it makes financial sense I am sure that they will come with some time of agreement because contracts don't get made via the media.

[WBC WBA IBF]

2.6 allows them to change everything in their rules when it comes to going to purse bids. That's the rule they're following.

There is absolutely no circumstance, even if the mandatory challenger was Canelo or Mike Tyson, where you can give the mandatory more than 50%. That is what rule 2.16 is addressing. Rule 2.16 doesn't deal at all with what the split would be if you modify in favor of the champion.

[M312]

The WBC are well within their right to impose an 80-20 split. I’d certainly take it.

It makes me laugh how some of you keep defending Dillian Whyte. Let’s look at the facts:
-Rejected TWO eliminator.
-Rejected a direct title shot.
-Failed TWO drug tests.

Now, yet again, he’s refusing to take another title opportunity yet somehow it’s Dillian that’s being treated unfairly. It’s like the boy who cried wolf.

It makes me laugh that you bring up irrelevant information to make a point about WBC rules being broken.

Anything you post is clearly out of emotion. Whether it's hate or some other ulterior motive. I know it's a forum, but damn...

[M312]

Yes, if you're going to use rule 2.16 modify in favor of the challenger, those are the allowed splits.

But if you're going to modify in favor of the champion, you use rule 2.6, which allows any split the WBC decides on.

You posted false information that interim champions are entitled to 45%. That's not true. The current rules don't say that as well.

Mauricio could bone your wife right in front of your face and you would say he is right and accept it.

Stop defending them needlessly and trying to cover up for them. It's weird. Never mind that they are killing boxing.

[M312]

I have never seen people so emotionally involved in how much a fighter should make for a fight when it's not even his title. If it makes financial sense I am sure that they will come with some time of agreement because contracts don't get made via the media.

I'm not at all bothered what he makes. But I am bothered that the WBC just think they can make up rules on the fly.

It needs to stop.

[WBC WBA IBF]

Mauricio could bone your wife right in front of your face and you would say he is right and accept it.

Stop defending them needlessly and trying to cover up for them. It's weird. Never mind that they are killing boxing.

You're personally insulting me to distract from the fact that you got caught posting false information.