Was it egregious? It was based on their recent splits and was based on the terms that they both signed up for with the WBO.
So how is that more egregious than being based on splits and not in accordance with the WBC's regs?
It really doesn't matter what anyone thinks is a fair split. It's like claiming a draw would be fairer overall when one bloke lost more rounds. The rules are the rules. The fighters sign up to fight within the rules.
So how is that more egregious than being based on splits and not in accordance with the WBC's regs?
It really doesn't matter what anyone thinks is a fair split. It's like claiming a draw would be fairer overall when one bloke lost more rounds. The rules are the rules. The fighters sign up to fight within the rules.

Comment