- Wants a belt @ CW
- Doesn't want to hear anything about the best CW ever
- Logical ducking ...
Comments Thread For: Canelo's Trainer Says "No Chance" a Fight With Usyk Ever Happens
Collapse
-
Comment
-
He's been Picking the Weakest Opponents in different weight classes for Years now.Well there it is from the horses mouth. Confirmation that Canelo and his team only want to fight the very weakest at cruiserweight and then run back to super middleweight and see that as some kind of achievement. Thanks for letting us know what a waste of time the Makubu fight is.
So this really shouldn't be surprizingComment
-
He's not held to those standards, he is doing it all by himself. Why did he went after kovalev, only a few weeks after the russian had a grueling and exhausting fight? They were two other and better champs to choose from. Why did he went after fielding instead of benavidez? And only made his intentions of unifying, after benavidez lost his belt. Now he wants to get another title or belt at cw, hah, again he's going after the weakest link. If you don't see a pattern here, it's not because you're blind, you just don't want to see it. Of course he ain't fighting usyk, and nobody can blame him. But don't announce that you want to win the title in certain division, and not fight the best of that weight. Be safeHere we go again… the standards this man is held too are crazy!! Just goes to show the greatness is real in Canelo… a former welterweight gets shat on for not fighting the undefeated former undisputed cruiser current unified heavyweight champion of the world… when, you big boxing experts tell me please when a former welter has ever been asked to fight a guy like that in the history of this sport… it should take you less then 1 second to answer that… GREATNESS!!!Last edited by BendOver; 01-01-2022, 10:40 PM.Comment
-
Excuses? That's your response? They're facts. I don't see the point with the "ginger" quote by the way. In any case that's the new generation, instead of stating an idea, you accuse the other person of been wrong, without any proof or a least some kind reason behind it.Comment
-
When a reply starts off with ''ginger'', I have to assume the entirety of that reply is slanted against Nelo
Excuses? That's your response? They're facts. I don't see the point with the "ginger" quote by the way. In any case that's the new generation, instead of stating an idea, you accuse the other person of been wrong, without any proof or a least some kind reason behind it.Comment
?
Comment