Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo's Trainer Says "No Chance" a Fight With Usyk Ever Happens

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    • Wants a belt @ CW
    • Doesn't want to hear anything about the best CW ever
    • Logical ducking ...
    Mrbinuk Mofias likes this.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by mexiFistology View Post

      That’s because Canelo is not even a cruiserweight fighter. He barely even belongs at 168 . Stop being ignorant
      I have no clue why you fanboys keep spouting this. Because he's short? So was Mike Tyson. Nelo is massive.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Gamboal00 View Post
        Well there it is from the horses mouth. Confirmation that Canelo and his team only want to fight the very weakest at cruiserweight and then run back to super middleweight and see that as some kind of achievement. Thanks for letting us know what a waste of time the Makubu fight is.
        He's been Picking the Weakest Opponents in different weight classes for Years now.

        So this really shouldn't be surprizing
        BaguMka BaguMka likes this.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Robi13 View Post

          Your hate won’t chance facts and history sorry try again
          Stats are Useless when Fighting Bums

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Andrij View Post
            He knows that Usyk would humiliate Canelo even if he goes back to Cruiserweight.

            no **** Sherlock.. Usyk has 40 lbs on him. God yall are ******

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Robi13 View Post
              Here we go again… the standards this man is held too are crazy!! Just goes to show the greatness is real in Canelo… a former welterweight gets shat on for not fighting the undefeated former undisputed cruiser current unified heavyweight champion of the world… when, you big boxing experts tell me please when a former welter has ever been asked to fight a guy like that in the history of this sport… it should take you less then 1 second to answer that… GREATNESS!!!
              He's not held to those standards, he is doing it all by himself. Why did he went after kovalev, only a few weeks after the russian had a grueling and exhausting fight? They were two other and better champs to choose from. Why did he went after fielding instead of benavidez? And only made his intentions of unifying, after benavidez lost his belt. Now he wants to get another title or belt at cw, hah, again he's going after the weakest link. If you don't see a pattern here, it's not because you're blind, you just don't want to see it. Of course he ain't fighting usyk, and nobody can blame him. But don't announce that you want to win the title in certain division, and not fight the best of that weight. Be safe
              Last edited by BendOver; 01-01-2022, 10:40 PM.
              BaguMka BaguMka likes this.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by BendOver View Post

                The ginger.
                I can tell a bunch of excuses were in your reply.
                Being brave goes both ways, bruh

                Comment


                • #68
                  No one demanded GGG be as risk taking as Nelo

                  Why is that ?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

                    I can tell a bunch of excuses were in your reply.
                    Being brave goes both ways, bruh
                    Excuses? That's your response? They're facts. I don't see the point with the "ginger" quote by the way. In any case that's the new generation, instead of stating an idea, you accuse the other person of been wrong, without any proof or a least some kind reason behind it.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by BendOver View Post

                      Excuses? That's your response? They're facts. I don't see the point with the "ginger" quote by the way. In any case that's the new generation, instead of stating an idea, you accuse the other person of been wrong, without any proof or a least some kind reason behind it.
                      When a reply starts off with ''ginger'', I have to assume the entirety of that reply is slanted against Nelo

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP