Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Why Pound-For-Pounds Lists Are All Meaningless
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by KingOfGlory View Post
The current P4P #1 is a redheaded Irishman. What exactly is your point?
Comment
-
Originally posted by M312 View PostP4P list these days is just who your favourite boxers are. Maybe based on resume, maybe not.
It was supposed to be to measure stick of 'if everyone was the same size, who would win', but that concept seems completely out the window
Scaling up a highly skilled fighter doesn't make a highly skilled heavyweight. It makes a heavyweight.
It's as legitimate as asking if a scaled up spider could beat a tiger in a fight. It doesn't matter, it couldn't happen.
No-one does gender for gender, or age for age. Why P4P?
If the logic is that we need to know who is the best then it's easy. We have an open weight category, with a few contenders who could actually fight each other.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Toffee View Post
Speed, coordination, stamina does change with size. That's why the 'P4P' number one isn't usually a Heavyweight.
Scaling up a highly skilled fighter doesn't make a highly skilled heavyweight. It makes a heavyweight.
It's as legitimate as asking if a scaled up spider could beat a tiger in a fight. It doesn't matter, it couldn't happen.
No-one does gender for gender, or age for age. Why P4P?
If the logic is that we need to know who is the best then it's easy. We have an open weight category, with a few contenders who could actually fight each other.
You're wanting a top 10 rankings list.
There is a difference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Toffee View Post
Speed, coordination, stamina does change with size. That's why the 'P4P' number one isn't usually a Heavyweight.
Scaling up a highly skilled fighter doesn't make a highly skilled heavyweight. It makes a heavyweight.
It's as legitimate as asking if a scaled up spider could beat a tiger in a fight. It doesn't matter, it couldn't happen.
No-one does gender for gender, or age for age. Why P4P?
If the logic is that we need to know who is the best then it's easy. We have an open weight category, with a few contenders who could actually fight each other.
In those cases they can certainly be considered for the top P4P spot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mexiFistology View PostBUT WHEN IDIOTS HAD LOMACHENKO AS THE NUMBER ONE P4P IN THE WORLD IDIOTS IN THIS WEBSITE INCLUDING KEITH IDEC DIDNT CARE ABOUT OTHER PEOPLES PERSPECTIVE. THEY HAD NO PROBLEM HAVING LOMA AS THE BEST ♂️ WHY? WHO KNOWS. Color COMPLEXION??? PROBABLY
Comment
Comment