joe fought more atg's than floyd....

[Kevin Jesus]

This thread makes no sense at all.

I'll explain why in a min....

Calzaghe retired at 36 years of age and only fought 2 ATG's in Jones and Hopkins, also two 40 year old's(Roy was damn near 40) Hopkins was 7 years away from being 50 years old. If you consider Kessler and Eubank ATG's idk what to tell you....


Here's the part that does not make sense, you say Joe fought more ATG's than Mayweather but Mayweather hasn't even retired. Comparing someone who is retired to someone who has about 3-4 more prime years left in their career is pretty ******.

Same as dumb posters comparing Dawson to Calzaghe when they are 10 years apart and Dawson has about 10 years before he turns 36. Very ******.

[baracuda]

Reid, that another controversial Calzaghe decision

wanna make a poll who really won that fight?....lol..

who did floyd fight who was in the top 10 p4p list?......

[PoetryInMotion]

was'nt bhop also in the top 10 p4p list when joe fought him?.....i think so but not sure...

I would agree that Bhop is the best name on either resume.

[King Flawless]

Calzaghe best win is over 43 year old Hopkins in an uninspiring performance which many thought he lost

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I would agree that Bhop is the best name on either resume.

Yep which is why I dont get why people constantly bring up the dudes age. Hes still doing it better than any of these young'uns.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Calzaghe best win is over 43 year old Hopkins in an uninspiring performance which many thought he lost

If Floyd fought someone of Hopkins calibre, it might create a close fight too.

[Doctor_Tenma]

I would agree that Bhop is the best name on either resume.

There is no debating that B-Hop > JLC, Corrales but you gotta take into account that

1. Calzaghe didn't decisively beat Bernard Hopkins.
2. Bernard Hopkins was 42 years old.

Where as Corrales was prime, knocking out everyone at the time and was favored against Mayweather. Mayweather also dominated that fight, dropping Corrales 6 times I think it was. So I'd strongly disagree with Calzaghe's wins being better.

[King Flawless]

wanna make a poll who really won that fight?....lol..

who did floyd fight who was in the top 10 p4p list?......

Judah was number 9
Hatton was number 5
Corrales was number 5

I was waiting for that question. :wank::wank:

[King Flawless]

If Floyd fought someone of Hopkins calibre, it might create a close fight too.

You speak as if he beat a prime Hopkins. He arguably lost to a 43 year old

[baracuda]

This thread makes no sense at all.

I'll explain why in a min....

Calzaghe retired at 36 years of age and only fought 2 ATG's in Jones and Hopkins, also two 40 year old's(Roy was damn near 40) Hopkins was 7 years away from being 50 years old. If you consider Kessler and Eubank ATG's idk what to tell you....


Here's the part that does not make sense, you say Joe fought more ATG's than Mayweather but Mayweather hasn't even retired. Comparing someone who is retired to someone who has about 3-4 more prime years left in their career is pretty ******.

Same as dumb posters comparing Dawson to Calzaghe when they are 10 years apart and Dawson has about 10 years before he turns 36. Very ******.

how come bhop is still #3 p4p now ?...joe fought him earlier..dont tell me he was better now than when he fought joe..lol...never said kessler or eubank are atg's.....