Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Pacquiao-Spence, Canelo, Conor Benn, More
Collapse
-
the difference is, Crawford hasn’t struggled against any style he’s faced. All of his wins are convincing so you can’t make the same argument as you can when you reference how canelo has looked against skilled boxers with long jabs and speed. Bread is highly complimentary of canelo. The problem is, his fans refuse to accept ANY criticism or anything less than absolute glowing praise about him.
But Bread doesn't break that down for some reason. I don't know why, your guess is as good as mine.
I also found it odd that he would pick Arturo Gatti over Salido. The guy can beat Lomachenko and is a typical Mexican body puncher...but he won't know how to deal with Gatti and his body punches?
Yeah, ok.
I think this just further supports my East Coast bias hypothesis.Comment
-
I highly doubt Bread cares about whether some loser in his 7th username who has 24,000 posts in a little over 2 yrs and admits to coke snorting with underage teens respects him. And if there are one or two other nelo nut guzzlers than agree with you, nobody really cares. He has the best boxing mailbag today and you’re just some whiney euro who panders to Mexican fans with racist comments against black fans and boxers.Comment
-
Thuglife Nelo already beat me to it, but Mean Machine is a broke d¡ck version of Canelo and Dud Crawford struggled against him.
But Bread doesn't break that down for some reason. I don't know why, your guess is as good as mine.
I also found it odd that he would pick Arturo Gatti over Salido. The guy can beat Lomachenko and is a typical Mexican body puncher...but he won't know how to deal with Gatti and his body punches?
Yeah, ok.
I think this just further supports my East Coast bias hypothesis.Last edited by Jab jab boom; 08-07-2021, 06:56 PM.Comment
-
So it's fair game to nitpick Dud's far inferior resume, is it not?
I think your claim that Crawford has never struggled with anyone has been put to rest with the Kavaliuskas example.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Last edited by Jab jab boom; 08-07-2021, 07:16 PM.Comment
-
canelo isn’t avoided, Crawford is. Nobody is overating Crawford’s resume and celebrating it, Canelo’s resume is overstated when you really look at the context of it just like bread broke down in the mailbag. If your idea of struggling is winning a fight by a 9th round ko after two judges only gave your opponent 1 round and the third only gave your opponent 2 rounds (which means of 24 rounds scored by the 3 judges, only 4 went to kavaliuskas while 20 went to Crawford) then sure. I’ll just accept that you don’t know much boxing outside of canelo. It’s funny because canelo fans are the same ones who like to say he whooped ggg in the rematch but ignore that the fight was on the table in the 12th and would’ve been a draw had two judges not inaccurately scored that last round for canelo, and also ignore that of 50 press row scorecards, only two had canelo winning. But those are the same exact fans who say Crawford struggled with someone he dominated. Lmaoooo
Crawford is being overrated if you're ranking him above Canelo and using opponents as a reason. There's no justification for going through Canelo's resume with a fine-toothed comb but not doing the same to Crawford. It's a matter of basic fairness.
When the double standards start to come out that's when I start to suspect that there might be a deeper agenda at play.Comment
-
Dud isn't avoided either. Ugas would have fought him for cheap, Keith Thurman wanted some, Vergil Ortiz was willing, etc.
Crawford is being overrated if you're ranking him above Canelo and using opponents as a reason. There's no justification for going through Canelo's resume with a fine-toothed comb but not doing the same to Crawford. It's a matter of basic fairness.
When the double standards start to come out that's when I start to suspect that there might be a deeper agenda at play.
Comment
-
F0DDF563-6DF5-47E8-9A58-6501C8FEFBC5.jpegComment
Comment