Who proved superior skill over Marquez, PAC or FLOYD?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
What answer is that you moron, you were proven wrong and your answer is some rhetoric that don't mean sht.
Historians don't care that dl h said pac was trickiest he fought or that jm m said pac is best of era. Historians can judge themselves.
Pac s deals with common opponents much.more dominant so speaks for itself they wouldn't need to know what Pac s opponents have to say.
Just say yeah ok he did say Floyd was the best, that's what a stand-up guy does, I forgot you're a lying spineless troll my bad for thinking you were anything else.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
What is the big deal about Floyd beating a slow, flat footed, short, and short armed fighter in Marquez, who Floyd dragged up two weight classes in one fight, and really whose greatest claim to fame is having Manny's number.
At ww did this guy really beat anybody, and Floyd for sure isn't cracking top 10 atg for needing every conceivable advantage just to get a one sided points win over him. Was still too scared to go for a ko over him.
You Floyd boys sure get carried away with pedestalizing mediocrityLast edited by djtmal; 07-05-2021, 11:05 PM.Comment
-
The same Marquez that put Manny to sleep and went life and death with Manny 3 other times, Floyd toyed with him like he was an amateur just a class above him in every way.What is the big deal about Floyd beating a slow, flat footed, short, and short armed fighter in Marquez, who Floyd dragged up two weight classes in one fight, and really whose greatest claim to fame is having Manny's number.
At ww did this guy really beat anybody, and Floyd for sure isn't cracking top 10 atg for needing every conceivable advantage just to get a one sided points win over him. Was still too scared to go for a ko over him.
You Floyd boys sure get carried away with pedestalizing mediocrityComment
-
More skilled? Was the best? I'm sure jmm fans say jmm is more skilled than PAC, but what's it mean in the big scheme of things?
What answer is that you moron, you were proven wrong and your answer is some rhetoric that don't mean sht.
Just say yeah ok he did say Floyd was the best, that's what a stand-up guy does, I forgot you're a lying spineless troll my bad for thinking you were anything else.
Floyd being more skilled than PAC supposedly didn't help him beat dlh, Hatton or cotto more dominantly did it? Didn't allow Floyd to be fighting at highest level into 40s did it? Floyd being bigger and more skilled suppedly didnt help him ko pac did it? So what kind of credit and how much do you want people to give Floyd?Last edited by hugh grant; 07-06-2021, 04:34 AM.Comment
-
It means Floyd is the BETTER FIGHTER in the eyes of ALL common opponents, that's why he has no defeats and Manny has been stopped by B graders and has 7 losses, Floyd is the better fighter who would beat Manny from 135 to 154 every day of the week, they fought once and Floyd won easily that's game over, 140 and below Floyd stops Manny.
More skilled? Was the best? I'm sure jmm fans say jmm is more skilled than PAC, but what's it mean in the big scheme of things?
Floyd being more skilled than PAC supposedly didn't help him beat dlh, Hatton or cotto more dominantly did it? Didn't allow Floyd to be fighting at highest level into 40s did it? Floyd being bigger and more skilled suppedly didnt help him ko pac did it? So what kind of credit and how much do you want people to give Floyd?
Doesnt get any clearer in the big scheme of things Floyd is just the better boxer of the two and both are great live with it.Comment
Comment