Who proved superior skill over Marquez, PAC or FLOYD?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roadblock
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 14031
    • 3,535
    • 428
    • 108,713

    #31
    Originally posted by hugh grant

    No, jmm never said Floyd is greater. He said Floyd is difficult as he don't want to fight, difficult style and difficult to hit. Jmm didn't say Floyd was greater. He makes it clear who has better resume and career.
    JMM can't imagine, having x2 wins over, morales, barrrera, bradley and every thing else Pac has did
    The question wasn't greater you idiot it was who is better fighter, ALL common opponents said Floyd was the better fighter.

    Read the topic you fool look at the question asked we don't care what you see that others don't, do you understand what SUPERIOR SKILL is?

    Comment

    • Roadblock
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 14031
      • 3,535
      • 428
      • 108,713

      #32
      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua

      Floyd didn't son pac

      It was an uneventful fight

      Nothing happened

      Floyd best win was a boring fight where nothing happened but missing punches and clinches and moonwalk ing

      It was Manny that couldn't do anything lol, you fkn idiots don't understand when you are outclassed you cant do anything, so how can it be anything else but boring to casual fans, the greatest defensive fighter is a surgeon and youre crying a river because he is not a wrecking ball, casuals are all the same they don't know sht about this sport.

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30544
        • 2,201
        • 925
        • 105,596

        #33
        Originally posted by Roadblock

        The question wasn't greater you idiot it was who is better fighter, ALL common opponents said Floyd was the better fighter.

        Read the topic you fool look at the question asked we don't care what you see that others don't, do you understand what SUPERIOR SKILL is?
        No it doesn't sound like jmm said Floyd is the better fighter in the ring tv interview. Dlh said Pac was the trickiest fighter.
        Historians are the judge who is better fighter. Pac stops dlh, cott o and hatton much more efficiently so Pac will be deemed better fighter

        Comment

        • Roadblock
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2006
          • 14031
          • 3,535
          • 428
          • 108,713

          #34
          Originally posted by hugh grant

          No it doesn't sound like jmm said Floyd is the better fighter in the ring tv interview. Dlh said Pac was the trickiest fighter.
          Historians are the judge who is better fighter. Pac stops dlh, cott o and hatton much more efficiently so Pac will be deemed better fighter
          Watch it again, question- you fought Manny and Floyd who is better " I think Mayweather the best " then went on to explain why he thinks that.

          Manny stopping CW drained fighters means nothing he couldn't stop average B graders that were not drained by a CW that's more relevant to boxing purists not drained stoppages.

          Once again seeing as you are thick and it takes a lot to get past the fog, ALL as in every single common opponent ALL said Floyd is the better fighter.

          Comment

          • asgarth
            Moderator
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 3180
            • 268
            • 144
            • 36,835

            #35
            Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL

            Everything is a factor in boxing, that is why you have no real point.

            And yes you are complaining.

            Why don't you just come out, and explain what your issue is mate? Floyd Mayweather is no giant of a man, so stop trying to discredit his performance.

            Marquez was shut out over 12 rounds easy.

            The reason why, I keep mentioning that Marquez was not weight drained. Is because Marquez was given every opportunity to prepare and be in his best condition.

            Marquez was probably more comfortable from day to day training for Mayweather, than all of his previous fights before that point.





            im not complaining, was just responding to your statement, that marquez wasnt weight drained and you dont know why people bring up weight issues, because no one is saying that marquez was weight drained. Never read that before.

            Nothing more nothing less. And you seem to skip over parts when reading posts. Again, I said Mayweather would have likely beaten Marquez even if they were the same size, because styles make fights and Marquez always struggles with longer fighter who can fight on the outside.

            Size is a big factor, thats why we have weight classes and not height/power/speed/chin classes. If you went up 2 weight classes, it of course is an important enough factor.

            But again, Mayweather would have likely beat Marquez if they were the same size. Dont take everything so personally.

            Comment

            • Left Hook Tua
              VATNIK
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 62306
              • 7,010
              • 1,581
              • 951,318

              #36
              Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL

              Everything is a factor in boxing, that is why you have no real point.

              And yes you are complaining.

              Why don't you just come out, and explain what your issue is mate? Floyd Mayweather is no giant of a man, so stop trying to discredit his performance.

              Marquez was shut out over 12 rounds easy.

              The reason why, I keep mentioning that Marquez was not weight drained. Is because Marquez was given every opportunity to prepare and be in his best condition.

              Marquez was probably more comfortable from day to day training for Mayweather, than all of his previous fights before that point.





              Marquez weight drained?

              At welterweight?

              You bozos dont know what weight drained even means.

              Comment

              • Left Hook Tua
                VATNIK
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 62306
                • 7,010
                • 1,581
                • 951,318

                #37
                Originally posted by asgarth

                im not complaining, was just responding to your statement, that marquez wasnt weight drained and you dont know why people bring up weight issues, because no one is saying that marquez was weight drained. Never read that before.

                Nothing more nothing less. And you seem to skip over parts when reading posts. Again, I said Mayweather would have likely beaten Marquez even if they were the same size, because styles make fights and Marquez always struggles with longer fighter who can fight on the outside.

                Size is a big factor, thats why we have weight classes and not height/power/speed/chin classes. If you went up 2 weight classes, it of course is an important enough factor.

                But again, Mayweather would have likely beat Marquez if they were the same size. Dont take everything so personally.
                Youre gonna waste time arguing with a guy who doesn't even know what weight drained means?

                Comment

                • STREET CLEANER
                  The Watcher
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 19553
                  • 4,793
                  • 4,376
                  • 298,225

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Left Hook Tua

                  Barely edges out boring rounds.

                  True sign of greatness right there.
                  Point is that he out skilled them all no matter how you don't like it.

                  Comment

                  • hugh grant
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 30544
                    • 2,201
                    • 925
                    • 105,596

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Roadblock


                    Once again seeing as you are thick and it takes a lot to get past the fog, ALL as in every single common opponent ALL said Floyd is the better fighter.
                    Historians don't care that dl h said pac was trickiest he fought or that jm m said pac is best of era. Historians can judge themselves.
                    Pac s deals with common opponents much.more dominant so speaks for itself they wouldn't need to know what Pac s opponents have to say.
                    Last edited by hugh grant; 07-05-2021, 07:01 PM.

                    Comment

                    • pasawayako
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 15348
                      • 639
                      • 194
                      • 151,963

                      #40
                      Who has better skill? KSI or floyd?

                      KSI knock out logan paul while floyd could only manage a draw.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP