Who proved superior skill over Marquez, PAC or FLOYD?
Collapse
-
It was Manny that couldn't do anything lol, you fkn idiots don't understand when you are outclassed you cant do anything, so how can it be anything else but boring to casual fans, the greatest defensive fighter is a surgeon and youre crying a river because he is not a wrecking ball, casuals are all the same they don't know sht about this sport.Comment
-
No it doesn't sound like jmm said Floyd is the better fighter in the ring tv interview. Dlh said Pac was the trickiest fighter.
Historians are the judge who is better fighter. Pac stops dlh, cott o and hatton much more efficiently so Pac will be deemed better fighterComment
-
Watch it again, question- you fought Manny and Floyd who is better " I think Mayweather the best " then went on to explain why he thinks that.
Manny stopping CW drained fighters means nothing he couldn't stop average B graders that were not drained by a CW that's more relevant to boxing purists not drained stoppages.
Once again seeing as you are thick and it takes a lot to get past the fog, ALL as in every single common opponent ALL said Floyd is the better fighter.Comment
-
im not complaining, was just responding to your statement, that marquez wasnt weight drained and you dont know why people bring up weight issues, because no one is saying that marquez was weight drained. Never read that before.
Everything is a factor in boxing, that is why you have no real point.
And yes you are complaining.
Why don't you just come out, and explain what your issue is mate? Floyd Mayweather is no giant of a man, so stop trying to discredit his performance.
Marquez was shut out over 12 rounds easy.
The reason why, I keep mentioning that Marquez was not weight drained. Is because Marquez was given every opportunity to prepare and be in his best condition.
Marquez was probably more comfortable from day to day training for Mayweather, than all of his previous fights before that point.
Nothing more nothing less. And you seem to skip over parts when reading posts. Again, I said Mayweather would have likely beaten Marquez even if they were the same size, because styles make fights and Marquez always struggles with longer fighter who can fight on the outside.
Size is a big factor, thats why we have weight classes and not height/power/speed/chin classes. If you went up 2 weight classes, it of course is an important enough factor.
But again, Mayweather would have likely beat Marquez if they were the same size. Dont take everything so personally.
Comment
-
Marquez weight drained?
Everything is a factor in boxing, that is why you have no real point.
And yes you are complaining.
Why don't you just come out, and explain what your issue is mate? Floyd Mayweather is no giant of a man, so stop trying to discredit his performance.
Marquez was shut out over 12 rounds easy.
The reason why, I keep mentioning that Marquez was not weight drained. Is because Marquez was given every opportunity to prepare and be in his best condition.
Marquez was probably more comfortable from day to day training for Mayweather, than all of his previous fights before that point.
At welterweight?
You bozos dont know what weight drained even means.
Comment
-
Youre gonna waste time arguing with a guy who doesn't even know what weight drained means?
im not complaining, was just responding to your statement, that marquez wasnt weight drained and you dont know why people bring up weight issues, because no one is saying that marquez was weight drained. Never read that before.
Nothing more nothing less. And you seem to skip over parts when reading posts. Again, I said Mayweather would have likely beaten Marquez even if they were the same size, because styles make fights and Marquez always struggles with longer fighter who can fight on the outside.
Size is a big factor, thats why we have weight classes and not height/power/speed/chin classes. If you went up 2 weight classes, it of course is an important enough factor.
But again, Mayweather would have likely beat Marquez if they were the same size. Dont take everything so personally.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Historians don't care that dl h said pac was trickiest he fought or that jm m said pac is best of era. Historians can judge themselves.
Pac s deals with common opponents much.more dominant so speaks for itself they wouldn't need to know what Pac s opponents have to say.Last edited by hugh grant; 07-05-2021, 07:01 PM.Comment
-
Who has better skill? KSI or floyd?
KSI knock out logan paul while floyd could only manage a draw.
Comment
Comment