Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder Says a 'Lack of Loyalty' Led To Rematch Loss To Tyson Fury

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Monty Fisto View Post
    I expect Wilder to try and blast Fury out of there in the first round. It's possible.

    Fury just needs to wear Wilder down for a couple of rounds and his superior reflexes, endurance and technique should be enough to push the rest of the fight in his favour.
    Well tell his big ass to get in shape this time because I believe if Wilder boxes; Then he intends on extending this fight late into the championship rounds and then begin to open up and unload offensively on Fury as he punches himself out by chasing, swinging and missing Wilder as he fights off the back foot.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post


      Andre Dirrell, has recently confessed to being that 'Snake in the grass' Mark Breland's accomplice. Yet, this shocking revelation has not been given the appropriate media coverage that it deserves. Instead, what the media does ( including the boxingscene ) is quote Deontay Wilder's strong claims of corruption and scheming, because they know that's what triggers traffic.

      Nobody cares about the truth, casual-fans and devils only want to be entertained by Deontay's misfortune and struggles, this is why I support Deontay's silence and boycott of old-media.
      Great interview with Andre Dirrell. I felt the same way as Dirrell at the time. I believed his eardrum was ruptured and I believed Wilder was in bad shape, but I was still hoping he would find a way to turn the tide and knock Fury out. Now, after Wilder explained how weak he felt, after Wilder provided credible evidence of glove tampering, I feel very differently. You can guarantee the trilogy fight is going to be on a level playing field, or there will be no fight. I'm thinking this fight is going to be a Hagler-Hearns type of fight...

      The referee WAS going to stop it, but Breland made his decision. Doesn't matter what Dirrell advised him to do, Breland was Wilder's employee and was warned to never throw in the towel. He did it anyway and was fired immediately.

      The truth is hard for some people to handle. And human beings will ALWAYS be competitive in every aspect of life. Some will do whatever it takes to get an edge...

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post


        Andre Dirrell, has recently confessed to being that 'Snake in the grass' Mark Breland's accomplice. Yet, this shocking revelation has not been given the appropriate media coverage that it deserves. Instead, what the media does ( including the boxingscene ) is quote Deontay Wilder's strong claims of corruption and scheming, because they know that's what triggers traffic.

        Nobody cares about the truth, casual-fans and devils only want to be entertained by Deontay's misfortune and struggles, this is why I support Deontay's silence and boycott of old-media.
        No Elie, nobody cares about the moron aka 1hourBum,
        1inch****, 1minCum etc.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post



          The 'Bronze-Bomber' has accused Jermell Charlo of cooning. Deontay spoke facts with Fred 'The Barber' ; according to Deontay, the Charlo's are seeking the approval of their oppressor's, which keep the Charlo's off their P4P. I think there is truth in Deontay's reasoning.
          Powerful interview. You can either play the victim or you can rise to the challenge of being self-sufficient, knowing that it will be a constant fight to deal with snakes in the grass.

          Comment


          • #65
            And you all wanted this guy to talk lol? No Deontay, a lack of skills led to the loss and a lack of accountability will lead to another loss.

            Comment


            • #66
              I've always been sceptical about this but now I can see that Wilder was cheated out of a clear victory. He should get his unbeaten record and belt back. SO many people were against him in that fight
              champion4ever champion4ever likes this.

              Comment


              • #67
                i tried to support wilder, give him the benefit of the doubt, tried to argue for him when people said all he had was power but its true, he is one of the most one dimensional champs in history. all he has is a straight or looping telegraphed right hand and it has to be from a distance. Thats seriously all he has and with any B and above level fighter, he spends most of the match getting outboxed until it lands and benefits from most fighters being overly cautious to go after him due to his power but you neutralize that like Fury did with two separate strategies then Wilder has nothing, no plan B, nothing but excuses.

                Fury shut him down with two opposite but effective strategies. 1st fight he used his reach, height advantage and movement to stay out of distance of the right hand. Second fight he came inside and wilder has no power with that right hand in close, has no uppercut or hooks to the body, he had no solution for inside fighting.

                Even known brutes and sluggers like say a Foreman, were far more skilled and had far more tricks in their arsenal than wilder. Even 70s george had a body attack, had power in both hands, would push people back when they came inside to control the distance, which relied on his strength and not just power, ect.

                Wilder is the definition of one dimension
                Last edited by elfag; 06-26-2021, 11:30 AM.
                snowdog snowdog likes this.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Monty Fisto View Post
                  I expect Wilder to try and blast Fury out of there in the first round. It's possible.

                  Fury just needs to wear Wilder down for a couple of rounds and his superior reflexes, endurance and technique should be enough to push the rest of the fight in his favour.
                  I don't. I see Wilder holding back, carrying Fury, knocking him down multiple times, but not out, not until the late rounds. Taking some good shots from Fury but catching him over and over again, round after round, until a hellacious shot from Wilder blasts Fury out for longer than the 10 count.

                  Action packed.
                  Give and take.
                  Let's see what happens as it happens in real time.
                  Can't wait.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post

                    I don't. I see Wilder holding back, carrying Fury, knocking him down multiple times, but not out, not until the late rounds. Taking some good shots from Fury but catching him over and over again, round after round, until a hellacious shot from Wilder blasts Fury out for longer than the 10 count.

                    Action packed.
                    Give and take.
                    Let's see what happens as it happens in real time.
                    Can't wait.


                    why would wilder carry anybody? he drops rounds the entire fight until he lands. he is always head hunting for the knockout. its the only way he can even win against fury is with 3 or more knockdowns or a knockout

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Oldskoolg View Post

                      Sorry, 35 years ago is like last week to me. I’ve been a fan of the sport since the days of Ali, Lyle, Foreman, Loche, etc etc however gentlemen, it gets old, as I’ve said, the Americans seemingly have scores of examples of brits who’ve lost to Americans. Let’s lose the smaller island nation complex and sense of inferiority with the USA. We don’t do that with any other nation, only the USA. Think real
                      hard about why that is
                      Fair play, I don't discuss boxing with many people born sometime between 1950-60 though, so I use more modern analogies.

                      I also have no idea what this "small island" agenda you're pushing is about either. It's irrelevant.

                      I don't think Wilder is behaving like Ricky Hatton post Mayweather, Prince Naz after losing to Barrera, Bruno after Tyson, Lewis after McCall, Cooper after Ali (one especially for you), Minter after Hagler, Witter after Judah etc etc

                      This reminds me alot of how Lacy had his soul taken by Calzaghe and was never the same again.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP