Comments Thread For: Errol Spence: I Told Haymon I Want Crawford After Pacquiao Or Else I'm Moving To 154

[ShaneMosleySr]

So Spence just confirmed that Spence-Crawford is entirely up to Spence.

How does any single person hold Terence Crawford accountable for Spence’s ducking?

[Combat Talk Radio]

ggg was an A side before the canelo fight.
He had 2 ppv prior

But i agree with your crawford assessment

G was an A-Side against C-levels.

I'm talking about being A-Side against someone like Danny Jacobs. That NEVER would have happened if he hadn't fought Canelo and showed he was truly legit.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Pacquiao beats Spence to retirement.

[El_Mero]

All of a sudden his balls dropped and he wants Crawford, who had been calling him out for damn near 3 years now. Buffoonery at its finest. And I dont wanna hear that "he had a plan" fcuk all that, the best fight PERIOD in the WW division has ALWAYS been between him and crawford.

[QballLobo]

Did he tell Haymon to give Crawford a 60/40 split as well?

[El_Mero]

Pacquiao beats Spence to retirement.

Lets fuc.king hope so. Pullin for the OG, although I think Spence is stronger, longer reach and at his prime, while Pac is shorter, smaller, older and way passed his prime.

[peplz]

Crawford vs Spence will be nearly the last fight of their careers. I'm guessing it goes down in 2023.

Don’t give Spence any ideas.

[peplz]

This is the correct answer and has been for many years with Spence.

Every single person he's said he wants to fight, he has lined up and fought and beat them at some point when the other side comes to terms.

He's doing what Crawford only talks about doing.

That's why I keep saying Crawford should just accept B-Side if he thinks he could beat Spence - because it would literally SKYROCKET him if he could topple Spence at this point and wouldn't really hurt him that much if he lost. That's how much higher Spence is in the totem.

In fact, I would argue that just being across from Spence and putting in a hell of a performance, win-lose-draw, would actually help Crawford's numbers.

Golovkin was the same thing, he became an A-Side after losing to Canelo just because he was in there with a strong-drawing A-Side that gave him wider audience exposure.

B-Side, 60-40, 70-30, PPV numbers, conversations about promotional outfits and more blah blah blah excuses all initiated and continued by Errol Spence and company. Terence Crawford has moved on and is not even talking about Errol Spence anymore. Why is it that out of any fighter that Spence might fight Crawford is the only one that Spence talks to the media about money splits? If he was such the bigger draw why does he feel the need to plead to the media about it? What is understood does not need to be overstated. He’s done better numbers than Crawford. Why not just bring it to the negotiating table? We all know why. Duck duck goose…

[Fighter78]

This boy is a damn lie...now all of sudden he "wants Crawford"??....LOLOL....it was Pacquiao or BUST.

The ONLY way we're going to see the fights we want is if we ALL STOP PAYING TO SEE THESE FIGHTERS WHO ARE DUCKING....you can't call Spence out on this and then turn around and BUY HIS PPV FIGHT....WTF!?!? That's pure ******ity....if you're gonna buy his fight then STFU about him ducking.

[Combat Talk Radio]

He’s done better numbers than Crawford. Why not just bring it to the negotiating table?

He tried - years ago, right after Crawford beat Horn.

Crawford responded demanding 50-50.

Spence, knowing Crawford didn't deserve 50%, responded in kind:

#BlameBob