Floyd's 5 best wins

[Boxing-1013]

Sure but you were the one who had a post about Golovkin having a good resume, right? You'd think someone with that standard would look at Floyd's resume on boxrec and proclaim him as some type of God.

I don't look at boxrec to evaluate resumes. Maybe for some fighters it would be helpful as a reference. But you don't really need it for Floyd or most other top guys.

Yeah that's always been a point I've made - that beating solid fighters in their primes/at their best weight is imo a better win that beating a 'name' who is no longer close to that 'name' for whatever reason.

Never said Floyd had a bad resume. Never said GGG had a better body of work. I said his resume was underrated overall, and I think on this website it is.

I just saw some guy in another thread going on about how 'amazing' Floyd's was and I was a little stunned. I think Floyd had a great career but I thought most acknowledged the smoke and mirrors with the resume on some level. He was a superstar but if you are evaluating the top names on his resume, there are a lot of 'yeah, buts' if we are keeping it real. And we should keep it real.

People seemingly getting their feelings hurt over it is weird though. but that's NSB I guess. Not throwing that at you, moreso for a guy in a different thread.

[Mammoth]

I don't look at boxrec to evaluate resumes. Maybe for some fighters it would be helpful as a reference. But you don't really need it for Floyd or most other top guys.

Yeah that's always been a point I've made - that beating solid fighters in their primes/at their best weight is imo a better win that beating a 'name' who is no longer close to that 'name' for whatever reason.

Never said Floyd had a bad resume. Never said GGG had a better body of work. I said his resume was underrated overall, and I think on this website it is.

I just saw some guy in another thread going on about how 'amazing' Floyd's was and I was a little stunned. I think Floyd had a great career but I thought most acknowledged the smoke and mirrors with the resume on some level. He was a superstar but if you are evaluating the top names on his resume, there are a lot of 'yeah, buts' if we are keeping it real. And we should keep it real.

People getting their feelings hurt over it is super weird though.

Feelings huh? It's super funny seeing someone say Kell Brook and David Lemieux are good middleweight wins but Floyd's resume needs further inspection...

[Boxing-1013]

You have a autism disease called Echolalia!

The person with echolalia may repeat noises, phrases, or words. Echolalia is a symptom of brain damage or psychiatric disorders.

I think I feel kind of bad, like ---> you're austistic.

Look man. I'll make a deal with you. You seem like a decent guy.

I'm not a ******** man. But I do have some means. So I'm going to buy a horse. Get someone to train it really well.

And then I wanna throw your little ass on it and have you try and win the Kentucky Derby for me.

[just the facts]

floyd best win against prime opponent.

1. baldomir
2. corrales
3. castillo
4. ortiz
5. guerrero

not bad as good as crawford resume.

Floyd EASILY beat your hero and your undying man love will never change that.

[just the facts]

Man I thought Loma was basically tied with Linares before the KO. Thought his fight with Campbell was close and very competitive until Loma pulled away late. Thought he clearly lost to Lopez and max you could give him was 5 rounds. Thought Ouma was basically tied with GGG before the KO. Thought Fury-Wilder 1, the best score was clearly a draw.

I just call fights and fighters and resumes like I see 'em. Just because sometimes I score some for the white guy, I mean sometimes that guy wins, and sometimes he is a good fighter lol. Such is life.

Skip all of your this is how I scored it bu!!shyte. You lost all credibility with me when you started posting about how crappy the scorecards for Charlo/Derv were before (by your own admission) you even watched the fight.

[Boxing-1013]

Skip all of your this is how I scored it bu!!shyte. You lost all credibility with me when you started posting about how crappy the scorecards for Charlo/Derv were before (by your own admission) you even watched the fight.

They were 'crappy' in relation to the scores in the RBR thread. Not sure how hard that is for you to understand lol. But keep beating that dead horse.

When I watched the fight on Youtube right after the fight ended, I was expecting an 8-4, fairly clinical win for Charlo. I didn't see that, so I didn't score it that way.

[pasawayako]

Floyd EASILY beat your hero and your undying man love will never change that.

not a bad resume i believed a little better than crawford.

[just the facts]

They were 'crappy' in relation to the scores in the RBR thread. Not sure how hard that is for you to understand lol. But keep beating that dead horse.

When I watched the fight on Youtube right after the fight ended, I was expecting an 8-4, fairly clinical win for Charlo. I didn't see that, so I didn't score it that way.

Tell the truth, you didn't want to see that.

[just the facts]

not a bad resume i believed a little better than crawford.

As dumb and biased as you are, it doesn't matter what you believe.

[Pago007]

Best win would be Pacquiao still top 2 p4p at the time
Hatton undefeated with an engine for days
Mosley just came off destruction of Margs
Corralles undefeated and prime
Cotto decent win at a better weight
JMM p4p top 3
Castillo first fight at 35 against a champ
Baldomir unified champ
Canelo went on 2 be great