Tweet
No no no no no. The mistake you make here is you make a strong counterpoint that washes away the validity of that goons comment. We don't roll like that in Hearn threads. Say something bitter and inaccurate then walk away feeling better about yourself. That's the play in a Hearn thread.
-
-
As much as I've took the p**s out of Mr ***** I mean Hearn on here, there's no doubt he's the best uk promoter at the moment. Although the guy comes across as a geeky pr**k he is a brilliant business man and has made a fortune for medroom I mean matchroom. He is definitely a global promoter with shows all over the world so credit were credit is due. I'm a old school type of guy so side alot with frank warren, but no doubt Eddie is a great business man, good luck to all involved in boxing, as I think the sport is gonna need a bit of luck over the next few years. For me going to watch the fights is over for now, as I won't be taking the beast system Vax or test. Frrrreeeeeeeddddoooomm..Comment
-
LOL 2 weeks? Isn't that when the deadline on venue choice is for the Fury/Joshua fight?? Wonder if they're linked.Comment
-
Ten times beaten Chisora coming off another loss is top of his next PPv 'event' that's Mr.Big! Others are starting to see what shabby PPv's people will buy eg. Ruiz v Arreola ! , his business plan for himself and some boxers can not be faulted from a financial term but he's conning a lot of fan's with his sub standard PPv's when there is much better fights out there. I hope he leaves Sky and someone fills that void and gives him the competition to keep him on his toes so he stops this shyte PPv thing and puts on only top level fights on that platform.Comment
-
Please leave Sky...Comment
-
I love how my comment triggered you. You don't have to come to Eddie's defence in every thread you know. It's funny how you took my comment so personal.
p45a9.jpg?a449040.jpgComment
-
This is the correct answer. Signing a promotional deal with the biggest name in the sport would be viewed as positive by most people.
But they don't ask the question in any rational sense. It's thrown out there in knee-jerk parrot fashion in response to the stimulus of Hearn's name being mentioned.
Almost Pavlovian.
"Hearn"
"How's the American takeover going?"
"Hearn"
"Where's Whyte's B sample?"
They're not interested in actual answers, or they'd know that Whyte submitted numerous samples in the days before the Rivas fight and on the day of the Rivas fight that all tested negative, except one sample that had traces of metabolites. The only sensible conclusion that explains such results is a contamination to one sample and complete innocence on Whyte's part. But who cares about facts when you can mindlessly parrot Where's the B Sample?Comment
-
Comment