Yet a slick fighter is the highest grossing boxer of all time in the history of the sport...If YOU don't like slick boxers than say that. Everyone doesn't share your opinion and the numbers clearly show that. The sport is called boxing not brawling...get a ***n clue clown.
Comments Thread For: Vergil Ortiz Drops Maurice Hooker, Stops Him in Seventh
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
What has Crawford done in his entire career thats so impressive? Hooker got kod because he fought 2 powerful punchers who are elite & could fight at 154 if they wanted,but I have no doubt Hooker would beat most Buds resume of Shell Brooks,AmereCon,Indongo,Horn,1 legged drive by victim. I have no doubt Hooker would be undisputed had he faced Indongo,Burns,Postal at 140 like Crawford did. That said I don't think Ortiz is ready for Spence,but I do think he beats Bud who went 12 with worse fighters than HookerComment
-
Well TC has won titles from 135 to 147 so that's pretty impressive. I'll agree that he doesn't have the best or greatest resume as far as names are concerned, but you can only beat who they put in front of you. Hell TBH I didn't think Floyd's resume was all that impressive until he started beating guys well into his 30s, that's really when I think everybody started to finally come around whether you loved or hated him. So It's more about the accomplishments. You can't take 3 titles in 3 diff weight classes away from em. Even with Broner as lame as he is, that's a great accomplishment.
What has Crawford done in his entire career thats so impressive? Hooker got kod because he fought 2 powerful punchers who are elite & could fight at 154 if they wanted,but I have no doubt Hooker would beat most Buds resume of Shell Brooks,AmereCon,Indongo,Horn,1 legged drive by victim. I have no doubt Hooker would be undisputed had he faced Indongo,Burns,Postal at 140 like Crawford did. That said I don't think Ortiz is ready for Spence,but I do think he beats Bud who went 12 with worse fighters than Hooker
I think what sets Bud apart is his confidence in his ability and willingness to face the top dog win, lose or draw and the fact that there's now a perception that Spence has been reluctant to face him in a unification bout, and it's to the point where it can be considered ducking because both guy's are over 30 years old.Last edited by Realizniguhnit; 03-21-2021, 12:23 AM.Comment
-
Belts are a dime a dozen now but who did he beat for those bogus “titles”???
Well TC has won titles from 135 to 147 so that's pretty impressive. I'll agree that he doesn't have the best or greatest resume as far as names are concerned, but you can only beat who they put in front of you. Hell TBH I didn't think Floyd's resume was all that impressive until he started beating guys well into his 30s. So It's more about the accomplishments. You can't take 3 titles in 3 diff weight classes away from em. Even with Broner as lame as he is, that's a great accomplishment.
I think what sets Bud apart is his confidence in his ability and willingness to face the top dog win, lose or draw and the fact that there's now a perception that Spence has been reluctant to face him in a unification bout, and it's to the point where it can be considered ducking because both guy's are over 30 years old.
crawford has such a crappy resume its comical how he gets mentioned in the top 5Comment
-
Comment