Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATG Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by sandyvahra View Post
    Pacquiao

    TS, if you want to judge who the better fighter is on technical boxing ability then sure Floyd. But the buck stops there. ATG lists are not made up of the best technical boxers, if it were you would have guys such as PBF, B-HOP, Whitaker, Pepp etc much higher. Furthermore you wan't to judge these two when theyre age 16 when Pac was a pro, and floyd had 6 losses in the amateurs? Floyd was groomed to fight from the get go. Manny was not. Over the last 10 years which fighter has evolved more? Life ain't about being perfect, it's about improving. Judging them both by the same standards Pac done the following:

    1. Won more lineal titles than Mayweather
    2. Won more world titles than Mayweather.
    3. Became a world champion the same time as floyd, considering floyds retirements he's been a world champion longer.
    4. Pac's career has spanned more weight classes.
    5. Pac has fought in more weight classes.
    6. Pac has won 6 world titles in 6 different weight classes.
    7. If Pac beats Cotto, he will have his 3rd fighter of the year award which would be more than pbf & a record and 7 titles in 7 weight classes
    8. Ring magazine named Pac fighter of the decade for the 2000s.
    9. Pac's resume/overall body of work is better than Floyds (refer to any number of previous polls done on here.
    10. Pac caters to the fans a lot more than pbf does in that he consistently looks to challenge himself and take the toughest fights.

    Now the above are just in the ring, outside the ring:
    1. Pac's story is amazing. Something hollywood couldnt even dream of. Can you name a better rags to riches story? As good maybe, but better? No way.
    2. Pac was rated in forbes top 100 most influential people in the world.
    3. The man has his face on a stamp in the phillipines.
    4. The crime rate in Manilla drops to near 0 only during his fights.
    5. A civil war seizes fire for 24 hours during his fights.
    6. In 6 years since the Barrera fight he has climbe to the top, defied odds & taken over boxing the old fashioned way.
    7. He's got a nike commercial with Kobe Bryant coming out next month.
    8. He's got former presidents wanting to see him.
    9. Future president of his country.
    10. A symbol of hope for 100,000,000 people around the globe.
    11. He can barely speak english but he's made boxing hot again, something floyd has never and will never do.

    If there was an argument about them inside the ring, there isn't anymore when you consider them outside the ring.

    Despite all the above, floyd is a better technical boxer. Pac is a better fighter. As Thomas Hauser said, boxing is a skill, fighting is the spirit in which you display that skill. Pac represents the best of boxing. Pac is a higher ATG at this time.

    You summed up your problem when you started barking about Pac's losses. Nobody is perfect. That's ignorance at it's best. Human nature will appreciate a man who takes risks and faces the jaws of defeat over a man that stays outside that radius. For these reasons Pac is the greatest fighter on the planet.

    If you look carefully at the ATG list you'll see the common denominator are the losses.
    Jiddu_Dali... u need to counter this...cuz this post closes this thread

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Pacdbest View Post
      You got it right!!! In the old days Fighters fought every 2 weeks or 12 times a year. That was a different era. They need to fight more to make money. With the TV mOney on today's era, fighter's make more money with less fights.

      But I look at it like this. If Pac was on that 40-50s era, he'll accumulate Hundreds of KO wins also. If SRR was on today's era, he'll be fighting only 2-3 times a year only. But Pac also Sparred with some of the Best upcomers today. And they do it like Real fights at the wildcard Gym. You can easily add Valero, Linares, Vasquez, Khan, Ortiz, etc to Pac's resume. Some of these Guys will be in the top 10 P4P after Pac retires, and we've seen some of those sparring & it shows how Pac dominates them.

      I already seen Pep, SRR & Armstrong many times in youtube. I've seen SRL. Hearns & Duran in live TV in the 80s. I've watched watch them all fights in youtube back to back & side by side. Then I watched Pac Great fights & I always came with the conclusion that Pac can beat all these Greats.
      WOW!!!!!!!! this deserves no rebuttal

      Comment


      • #63
        For me Pacquiao just edges it slightly, They both have similar path in terms of achievement but as of now i would have to go with pacquiao.

        Comment


        • #64
          I voted Floyd but it's a really tough question...

          Answer would be easier after I watch Mayweather/Marquez & Pacquiao/Cotto

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by ny123 View Post
            i actually was talking about his fights against jmm which was the last time i saw him in the ring with a live opponent. no excuses i am not a mayweather fan . the bottom line is i dont buy the hype on pac being a better fighter then floyd. pac is an alltime great at lw with his track record but he is not a better fighter then floyd and will be exposed at ww by cotto.
            Cotto will be an easy fight again. And you will have excuses again. You'll say Cotto was shot, Cotto was drained!!!

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Post
              typo

              and I agree he fought 3 tough Mexican fighters.........we all know Pac has been put in with fighters who are 1 trick ponys...(besides Marquez)

              and why hasnt anyone acknowledged that mannys first 35 fights were in the philippines vs nobodies......and was KOed twice, he lost to Morales once and had a draw with marquez.....do you factor all of this in when considering whom the greater fighter is?
              losses and draws factor somewhat but just because a guy has losses does not mean much.

              there are 100 times more all-time greats that have losses than all-time greats that are undefeated.

              you keep talking about pacquiao fighting nobodies in philippines.

              he didn't just fight in philippines. he fought in other asian countries as well.

              what do you expect? he's an asian fighter.

              why hasn't mayweather fought outside the u.s.?

              you act like mayweather fought top 10 competition from his 1st pro fight.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Pacdbest View Post
                You got it right!!! In the old days Fighters fought every 2 weeks or 12 times a year. That was a different era. They need to fight more to make money. With the TV mOney on today's era, fighter's make more money with less fights.

                But I look at it like this. If Pac was on that 40-50s era, he'll accumulate Hundreds of KO wins also. If SRR was on today's era, he'll be fighting only 2-3 times a year only. But Pac also Sparred with some of the Best upcomers today. And they do it like Real fights at the wildcard Gym. You can easily add Valero, Linares, Vasquez, Khan, Ortiz, etc to Pac's resume. Some of these Guys will be in the top 10 P4P after Pac retires, and we've seen some of those sparring & it shows how Pac dominates them.

                I already seen Pep, SRR & Armstrong many times in youtube. I've seen SRL. Hearns & Duran in live TV in the 80s. I've watched watch them all fights in youtube back to back & side by side. Then I watched Pac Great fights & I always came with the conclusion that Pac can beat all these Greats.

                Sorry but i disagree, Yes style makes fight but if Pacman cant get rid of JMM in 2 fights then i wouldnt necessarily give him a chance of beating the people who you just mentioned.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Post
                  your logic is flawed....

                  George Foreman KO'ed Frazier, battered him all around the ring. Ali couldnt knock down Frazier in 3 fights..

                  who is the greater fighter.....Ali or Foreman?
                  Ali coz he beat Foreman. Pac will be greater coz Pac will KO Floyd!!!

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    pacquiao has fought more fights against future HOFers.

                    pacquiao has won titles in more weight divisions.

                    pacquiao has beaten more guys that were on the top 10 p4p list.

                    pacquiao has won more fights as the underdog.

                    pacquiao has more lineal titles.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Anyone who votes for Floyd is an idiot.


                      end thread.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP