Tweet
did you really bump a 2 year old thread, I thought this **** was new as I was reading your posts and SMH at the same time. I don't why why y'all argue over who will be a higher atg, everyone has their opinion and anybody who is a fan of either is going to pick that boxer, but you sir said some outrageous things.
When is comes to overall boxing ability its Floyd > Pac. when it comes to exciting its Pac > Floyd. I just happen to prefer technical boxing.
We are really splitting hairs over who has the best resume. Both have fought their share of hofers or future hofers, both have dominated many weight divisions and opponents. Manny dominated DLH and Hatton better than Floyd but styles make fights an its not only who you fight but when you fight them.
Mayweather didn't use his size adv to beat Marquez he use his superior boxing ability.
you sound like my friend Dez, he's a Pac **** rider too, everytime Pac fights he says he is gonna whoop so and so's ass, each time it happens he goes see see, its easy to pick your fav boxer, even easier when he is considered one of the best.
I picked him against DLH, first reason I don't like DLH, second reason he was far past it and third reason I knew he would beat weight drained and a zombie.
I don't think anyone picked Hatton to win, my god it was a complete mis match and he was a walking KO waiting to happen even before Floyd beat him.
I picked Cotto, because I believe Cotto is a better boxer, but I had reservations because of the marg beat down, Once Cotto got hit hard he wasn't the same.
I knew Pac would beat Clottey all you gotta do is keep throwing.
Picked Pac to beat marg but at the Same time said marg could KO him, just too too too slow.
Everyone know mosley couldn't pull the trigger anymore, Floyd took whatever mosley had left.
the point is your not a genius because you picked your favorite fighter, who just happens to be one of the best, to beat that line up of fighters.
You can pick your dude to win, but it makes it more fun when watching to have reasons of why the other boxer could win.
be a fan dude but damn don't be so bias
When is comes to overall boxing ability its Floyd > Pac. when it comes to exciting its Pac > Floyd. I just happen to prefer technical boxing.
We are really splitting hairs over who has the best resume. Both have fought their share of hofers or future hofers, both have dominated many weight divisions and opponents. Manny dominated DLH and Hatton better than Floyd but styles make fights an its not only who you fight but when you fight them.
Mayweather didn't use his size adv to beat Marquez he use his superior boxing ability.
you sound like my friend Dez, he's a Pac **** rider too, everytime Pac fights he says he is gonna whoop so and so's ass, each time it happens he goes see see, its easy to pick your fav boxer, even easier when he is considered one of the best.
I picked him against DLH, first reason I don't like DLH, second reason he was far past it and third reason I knew he would beat weight drained and a zombie.
I don't think anyone picked Hatton to win, my god it was a complete mis match and he was a walking KO waiting to happen even before Floyd beat him.
I picked Cotto, because I believe Cotto is a better boxer, but I had reservations because of the marg beat down, Once Cotto got hit hard he wasn't the same.
I knew Pac would beat Clottey all you gotta do is keep throwing.
Picked Pac to beat marg but at the Same time said marg could KO him, just too too too slow.
Everyone know mosley couldn't pull the trigger anymore, Floyd took whatever mosley had left.
the point is your not a genius because you picked your favorite fighter, who just happens to be one of the best, to beat that line up of fighters.
You can pick your dude to win, but it makes it more fun when watching to have reasons of why the other boxer could win.
be a fan dude but damn don't be so bias
Comment