JMM vs. Pac II

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PowerpuG
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 617
    • 71
    • 60
    • 743

    #11
    I had this fight 114-113 jmm when I re-watched it.. I thought Pac won it at first but then changed my mind after i saw it again

    Comment

    • madsweeney
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 4551
      • 508
      • 298
      • 14,237

      #12
      Originally posted by nj_evoixgsr
      you will find JMM supporters can't score the fight or explain why. i bet 99% of this thread that say JMM won cannot clearly point out how they scored it or give a better answer than his **** was in their ass while watching the fight.
      I know what you mean, many of them give at least one 10-8 round to JMM even though he failed to knock down Pac.

      Comment

      • PowerpuG
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 617
        • 71
        • 60
        • 743

        #13
        I had it 114-113 JMM, but only after I rewatched it.. At first I thought Pac won till I saw it a few times

        Comment

        • Bogler
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 2347
          • 124
          • 80
          • 9,907

          #14
          Originally posted by powerpug
          I had it 114-113 JMM, but only after I rewatched it.. At first I thought Pac won till I saw it a few times
          fair enough. if your vote went from one to the other it means you saw a close fight. the problem i have is w/ some ppl who say jmm CLEARLY won the fight and was robbed.

          Comment

          • Doctor_Tenma
            Monster
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 33313
            • 1,327
            • 1,249
            • 58,127

            #15
            Originally posted by KittenFlaps
            Woah there, man. I understand you'd hate to see a JMM vs. Pac II discussion interrupting the flow of Cotto and Pac nuthugging/bashing threads, I just figured seeing as it's been a year and a half, maybe people have a new outlook on this fight, and maybe they'd be more willing to respond to a new thread instead of a post on page 49 of a year old thread.

            I'm not forcing you to read the post (which you obviously didn't) so don't come in being a jerk about it. There's a thousand other threads all basically talking about the same things, go post in there if you aren't gonna be on topic.

            Or you can stay here and discuss the fight with someone who actually wants to have a legit, coherent discussion about it.
            It wasn't a year ago, neither was it 3 months ago. I can't remember who started the thread but everyone jumped on it, everyone pretty much discussed it, gave their opinion and voted. Not only that, even in that thread people complained about how everyone should move on.

            Marquez lead the poll, not only did he lead the poll, a good 30% of Pacquiao's voters were alts. Some of them, you never seen post before. Anyway, many agreed that the fight could have gone either way and so on. I'll give my opinion again just for the heck of it. It was a close but clear win for Marquez, I've watched it plenty, don't plan on watching it again, maybe I will just to score it. If I remember correctly, I had Marquez up by 2, so when people say the K.D made the difference, I strongly disagree there. my 2 cents, I still hope people move on.

            Comment

            • switch44
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 162
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,221

              #16
              You could call it either way on this fight or it could have been a draw...
              The knockout really made a big difference there..

              Comment

              • Doctor_Tenma
                Monster
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 33313
                • 1,327
                • 1,249
                • 58,127

                #17
                Originally posted by KittenFlaps
                Woah there, man. I understand you'd hate to see a JMM vs. Pac II discussion interrupting the flow of Cotto and Pac nuthugging/bashing threads, I just figured seeing as it's been a year and a half, maybe people have a new outlook on this fight, and maybe they'd be more willing to respond to a new thread instead of a post on page 49 of a year old thread.

                I'm not forcing you to read the post (which you obviously didn't) so don't come in being a jerk about it. There's a thousand other threads all basically talking about the same things, go post in there if you aren't gonna be on topic.

                Or you can stay here and discuss the fight with someone who actually wants to have a legit, coherent discussion about it.
                It wasn't a year ago man, neither was it 3 months ago. I can't remember who started the thread but everyone jumped on it, everyone pretty much discussed it, gave their opinion and voted. Not only that, even in that thread people complained about how everyone should move on.

                Marquez lead the poll, not only did he lead the poll, a good 30% of Pacquiao's voters were alts. Some of them, you never seen post before. Anyway, many agreed that the fight could have gone either way and so on. I'll give my opinion again just for the heck of it. It was a close but clear win for Marquez, I've watched it plenty, don't plan on watching it again, maybe I will just to score it. If I remember correctly, I had Marquez up by 2, so when people say the K.D made the difference, I strongly disagree there. my 2 cents, I still hope people move on.

                Comment

                • nj_evoixgsr
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 819
                  • 33
                  • 11
                  • 7,073

                  #18
                  Originally posted by KittenFlaps
                  I had it about the same. I understand there's those judges who like boxers and those judges who like fighters, but I saw both fighters being pretty technical, Pac just seemed to be doing more and scoring more.

                  I dont understand how so many see this as a robbery and that's where this thread is aimed.

                  Any JMM supporters out there wanna say how they had it scored and why?
                  you will find JMM supporters can't score the fight or explain why. i bet 99% of this thread that say JMM won cannot clearly point out how they scored it or give a better answer than his **** was in their ass while watching the fight.

                  Comment

                  • Doctor_Tenma
                    Monster
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 33313
                    • 1,327
                    • 1,249
                    • 58,127

                    #19
                    Originally posted by KittenFlaps
                    Woah there, man. I understand you'd hate to see a JMM vs. Pac II discussion interrupting the flow of Cotto and Pac nuthugging/bashing threads, I just figured seeing as it's been a year and a half, maybe people have a new outlook on this fight, and maybe they'd be more willing to respond to a new thread instead of a post on page 49 of a year old thread.

                    I'm not forcing you to read the post (which you obviously didn't) so don't come in being a jerk about it. There's a thousand other threads all basically talking about the same things, go post in there if you aren't gonna be on topic.

                    Or you can stay here and discuss the fight with someone who actually wants to have a legit, coherent discussion about it.
                    It wasn't a year ago man, neither was it 3 months ago. I can't remember who started the thread but everyone jumped on it, everyone pretty much discussed it, gave their opinion and voted. Not only that, even in that thread people complained about how everyone should move on.

                    Marquez lead the poll, not only did he lead the poll, a good 30% of Pacquiao's voters were alts. Some of them, you never seen post before. Anyway, many agreed that the fight could have gone either way and so on. I'll give my opinion again just for the heck of it. It was a close but clear win for Marquez, I've watched it plenty, don't plan on watching it again, maybe I will just to score it. If I remember correctly, I had Marquez up by 2, so when people say the K.D made the difference, I strongly disagree there. my 2 cents, I still hope people move on.

                    Comment

                    • PowerpuG
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 617
                      • 71
                      • 60
                      • 743

                      #20
                      JMM should have took this rematch when it was first offered instead of trying to snag a title from Chris John..that was an unnecessary loss..ended up w/ no win, no title, no more negotiation power for this fight

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP