JMM vs. Pac II

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ИATAS
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 36648
    • 2,509
    • 1,953
    • 50,835

    #41
    6 rounds for Marquez
    6 rounds for Pacquiao
    The knockdown being the 1 point difference.

    That's how I saw it.

    Comment

    • two_guns
      Banned
      • Feb 2009
      • 725
      • 24
      • 31
      • 887

      #42
      Lmao

      So Pacquiao won the fight huh?had control of the fight huh,?
      well I hate to disappoint you Pacquaio fans but even the world #1
      pacquaio fan "Ronnie Nathanielsz",and "Nonito Donaire " both scored it for
      Marquez!!
      are they pacquiao haterz! Nope.
      comming from a philipino reporter and a boxer ,that should answer your question .
      http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1239916

      ^^^^^^^^^PROOF^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

      Comment

      • brick wall
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 6480
        • 259
        • 35
        • 24,574

        #43
        Originally posted by KittenFlaps
        After watching the fight I was shocked. To me that wasn't even close. Pac clearly won a close fight. JMM did well, got shots in and looked technically sound, but Pac got the knockdown, got good shots in and looked technically sound.

        make up your mind

        Comment

        • two_guns
          Banned
          • Feb 2009
          • 725
          • 24
          • 31
          • 887

          #44
          So Pacquiao won the fight huh?had control of the fight huh,?
          well I hate to disappoint you Pacquaio fans but even the world #1
          pacquaio fan "Ronnie Nathanielsz",and "Nonito Donaire " both scored it for
          Marquez!!
          are they pacquiao haterz! Nope.
          comming from a philipino reporter and a boxer ,that should answer your question .
          http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1239916

          Comment

          • Idgas
            vas Normandy
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 3810
            • 111
            • 99
            • 10,583

            #45
            is there a way to ignore threads with the words "JMM", "PAC", and "II" together?

            sorry TS, but this discussion really gets on my nerves. the fight could have gone either way imo and i'm tired of reading "so-and-so CLEARLY won the fight. people who think otherwise are idiots" when it was a really close decision.

            Comment

            • FloydMoneyMay
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2008
              • 256
              • 27
              • 6
              • 6,536

              #46
              JMM beat him.

              Comment

              • elchurro420
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 197
                • 12
                • 10
                • 6,357

                #47
                It's Marquez by 1 point. 114-113.

                Marquez-Pacquiao II
                R1: 9-10 very close
                R2: 10-9
                R3: 8-10
                R4: 9-10 very close
                R5: 10-9
                R6: 10-9
                R7: 9-10 very close
                R8: 10-9
                R9: 10-9 close*
                R10: 9-10
                R11: 10-9 **
                R12: 10-9***
                TOTAL: 114-113

                * Can't believe Lederman gave this to Pac, close but clearly a JMM round.
                ** Pac tried to steal it in the end, but till then he hadn't landed anything else, Marquez round.
                *** Lederman gave this round to Pac.

                Comment

                • DrewWoodside
                  Lifestyle..Regular!
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 9244
                  • 317
                  • 590
                  • 16,453

                  #48
                  Originally posted by elchurro420
                  It's Marquez by 1 point. 114-113.

                  Marquez-Pacquiao II
                  R1: 9-10 very close
                  R2: 10-9
                  R3: 8-10
                  R4: 9-10 very close
                  R5: 10-9
                  R6: 10-9
                  R7: 9-10 very close
                  R8: 10-9
                  R9: 10-9 close*
                  R10: 9-10
                  R11: 10-9 **
                  R12: 10-9***
                  TOTAL: 114-113

                  * Can't believe Lederman gave this to Pac, close but clearly a JMM round.
                  ** Pac tried to steal it in the end, but till then he hadn't landed anything else, Marquez round.
                  *** Lederman gave this round to Pac.
                  This thread is jacked. NSB was glitching and as a result everyone duplicate posted.

                  Comment

                  • Bogler
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 2347
                    • 124
                    • 80
                    • 9,907

                    #49
                    lol this website is ****ed up duplicate posts

                    Comment

                    • DrewWoodside
                      Lifestyle..Regular!
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 9244
                      • 317
                      • 590
                      • 16,453

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Bogler
                      lol this website is ****ed up duplicate posts
                      I think everything smoothed out now. NSB is back on track but posters might want to go back and delete duplicates so the thread reads okay. I went back and got rid of a couple.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP