I had this fight 114-113 jmm when I re-watched it.. I thought Pac won it at first but then changed my mind after i saw it again
JMM vs. Pac II
Collapse
-
I know what you mean, many of them give at least one 10-8 round to JMM even though he failed to knock down Pac.Comment
-
fair enough. if your vote went from one to the other it means you saw a close fight. the problem i have is w/ some ppl who say jmm CLEARLY won the fight and was robbed.Comment
-
It wasn't a year ago, neither was it 3 months ago. I can't remember who started the thread but everyone jumped on it, everyone pretty much discussed it, gave their opinion and voted. Not only that, even in that thread people complained about how everyone should move on.Woah there, man. I understand you'd hate to see a JMM vs. Pac II discussion interrupting the flow of Cotto and Pac nuthugging/bashing threads, I just figured seeing as it's been a year and a half, maybe people have a new outlook on this fight, and maybe they'd be more willing to respond to a new thread instead of a post on page 49 of a year old thread.
I'm not forcing you to read the post (which you obviously didn't) so don't come in being a jerk about it. There's a thousand other threads all basically talking about the same things, go post in there if you aren't gonna be on topic.
Or you can stay here and discuss the fight with someone who actually wants to have a legit, coherent discussion about it.
Marquez lead the poll, not only did he lead the poll, a good 30% of Pacquiao's voters were alts. Some of them, you never seen post before. Anyway, many agreed that the fight could have gone either way and so on. I'll give my opinion again just for the heck of it. It was a close but clear win for Marquez, I've watched it plenty, don't plan on watching it again, maybe I will just to score it. If I remember correctly, I had Marquez up by 2, so when people say the K.D made the difference, I strongly disagree there. my 2 cents, I still hope people move on.Comment
-
It wasn't a year ago man, neither was it 3 months ago. I can't remember who started the thread but everyone jumped on it, everyone pretty much discussed it, gave their opinion and voted. Not only that, even in that thread people complained about how everyone should move on.Woah there, man. I understand you'd hate to see a JMM vs. Pac II discussion interrupting the flow of Cotto and Pac nuthugging/bashing threads, I just figured seeing as it's been a year and a half, maybe people have a new outlook on this fight, and maybe they'd be more willing to respond to a new thread instead of a post on page 49 of a year old thread.
I'm not forcing you to read the post (which you obviously didn't) so don't come in being a jerk about it. There's a thousand other threads all basically talking about the same things, go post in there if you aren't gonna be on topic.
Or you can stay here and discuss the fight with someone who actually wants to have a legit, coherent discussion about it.
Marquez lead the poll, not only did he lead the poll, a good 30% of Pacquiao's voters were alts. Some of them, you never seen post before. Anyway, many agreed that the fight could have gone either way and so on. I'll give my opinion again just for the heck of it. It was a close but clear win for Marquez, I've watched it plenty, don't plan on watching it again, maybe I will just to score it. If I remember correctly, I had Marquez up by 2, so when people say the K.D made the difference, I strongly disagree there. my 2 cents, I still hope people move on.Comment
-
you will find JMM supporters can't score the fight or explain why. i bet 99% of this thread that say JMM won cannot clearly point out how they scored it or give a better answer than his **** was in their ass while watching the fight.I had it about the same. I understand there's those judges who like boxers and those judges who like fighters, but I saw both fighters being pretty technical, Pac just seemed to be doing more and scoring more.
I dont understand how so many see this as a robbery and that's where this thread is aimed.
Any JMM supporters out there wanna say how they had it scored and why?
Comment
-
It wasn't a year ago man, neither was it 3 months ago. I can't remember who started the thread but everyone jumped on it, everyone pretty much discussed it, gave their opinion and voted. Not only that, even in that thread people complained about how everyone should move on.Woah there, man. I understand you'd hate to see a JMM vs. Pac II discussion interrupting the flow of Cotto and Pac nuthugging/bashing threads, I just figured seeing as it's been a year and a half, maybe people have a new outlook on this fight, and maybe they'd be more willing to respond to a new thread instead of a post on page 49 of a year old thread.
I'm not forcing you to read the post (which you obviously didn't) so don't come in being a jerk about it. There's a thousand other threads all basically talking about the same things, go post in there if you aren't gonna be on topic.
Or you can stay here and discuss the fight with someone who actually wants to have a legit, coherent discussion about it.
Marquez lead the poll, not only did he lead the poll, a good 30% of Pacquiao's voters were alts. Some of them, you never seen post before. Anyway, many agreed that the fight could have gone either way and so on. I'll give my opinion again just for the heck of it. It was a close but clear win for Marquez, I've watched it plenty, don't plan on watching it again, maybe I will just to score it. If I remember correctly, I had Marquez up by 2, so when people say the K.D made the difference, I strongly disagree there. my 2 cents, I still hope people move on.Comment
Comment