they didn't take the car, they tried to and when they couldn't they ran away
they weren't using the guns on ANYONE. if they were, they wouldn't have run away, common sense
When there is a mutual combat upon a sudden quarrel both parties are the aggressors, and if in the fight one is killed it will be manslaughter at least, unless the survivor can prove two things: 1st. That before the mortal stroke was given be had refused any further combat, and had retreated as far as he could with safety; and 2d. That he killed his adversary from necessity, to avoid his own destruction.
of course i have issues. i'm posting what would have happened if he killed them before the exchange of fire occurred. lawmakers must have serious issues too
they weren't using the guns on ANYONE. if they were, they wouldn't have run away, common sense
When there is a mutual combat upon a sudden quarrel both parties are the aggressors, and if in the fight one is killed it will be manslaughter at least, unless the survivor can prove two things: 1st. That before the mortal stroke was given be had refused any further combat, and had retreated as far as he could with safety; and 2d. That he killed his adversary from necessity, to avoid his own destruction.
of course i have issues. i'm posting what would have happened if he killed them before the exchange of fire occurred. lawmakers must have serious issues too
Comment