Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Moorer talking absolute nonsense

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
    Oh yeah.....you're the moron who sucks off the Klitschkos in his dreams over and over again every night. What's the matter chase? Holmes not have the "correct" pigmantation for you?

    Poet
    Low.


    That guy's a Roy Jones Jr. fan. So skin color obviously isn't the issue.



    This is your problem - anytime someone comes with a contrary opinion to yours, you pull the 'nuthugger' and race cards whether applicable or not (often not).
    I haven't seen this guy post anything suggestive of a bias toward white, or specifically European fighters, yet you keep pushing that angle in spite of having nothing to support it.

    Constant exhibition of this behavioural defect is why your presence here is a perpetual waste of whatever knowledge you possess.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Man In Black View Post
      Low.


      That guy's a Roy Jones Jr. fan. So skin color obviously isn't the issue.



      This is your problem - anytime someone comes with a contrary opinion to yours, you pull the 'nuthugger' and race cards whether applicable or not (often not).
      I haven't seen this guy post anything suggestive of a bias toward white, or specifically European fighters, yet you keep pushing that angle in spite of having nothing to support it.

      Constant exhibition of this behavioural defect is why your presence here is a perpetual waste of whatever knowledge you possess.
      Bravo! This guy clearly isn't worthy of sporting Joe Louis on his avatar! Btw, it's clear from my nickname that I am a fan of Nigel Benn and Matthew Saad Muhammad, who were also...what race? You got it right-black!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Man In Black View Post
        Low.

        That guy's a Roy Jones Jr. fan. So skin color obviously isn't the issue.

        This is your problem - anytime someone comes with a contrary opinion to yours, you pull the 'nuthugger' and race cards whether applicable or not (often not).
        I haven't seen this guy post anything suggestive of a bias toward white, or specifically European fighters, yet you keep pushing that angle in spite of having nothing to support it.

        Constant exhibition of this behavioural defect is why your presence here is a perpetual waste of whatever knowledge you possess.
        Anyone who thinks Wlad is a great Heavyweight is either:

        A. ******

        B. A nuthugging Fan-boi

        C. A Slavic Supremacist

        D. All Of The Above

        Anyone believing something so self-evidently false inevitably will fit into one of those catagories.

        But hey, seeing as your a self-admitted Communist I don't expect you to possess any real analytical power.....After all, if you had any intelligence you wouldn't be a Red.

        Poet

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View Post
          Bravo! This guy clearly isn't worthy of sporting Joe Louis on his avatar! Btw, it's clear from my nickname that I am a fan of Nigel Benn and Matthew Saad Muhammad, who were also...what race? You got it right-black!
          That's a beard.....you're Tunney's alt and you only like Eastern-Euros.

          Poet

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View Post
            I think you guys are overlooking one major fact-Wlad's power. And the size advantage. Holmes was no Corrie Sanders.
            Wlad's power isn't as much as Shavers and Holmes stood up to that ok.
            Lets look at the size advantage which is obviously the be all and end all to boxing.
            Wlad has what 3 inches and a stone on Holmes? Cooney was the same size as Wlad so Holmes won't exactly run for it when he sees Wlad.
            Reach is the same, Holmes has the better jab so no easy pay day for Wlad there. There have been "big" heavyweights before you know, just they were in strong eras and didn't do very well.
            Wlad's biggest weapon is the jab and his power right? Well Holmes has a better jab and has a great chin and ring craft. He won't being walking forward like that last guy and if he does get caught I believe he will absorb it.
            So no easy win for Wlad, I don't believe Holmes will blitz him out early either so nice long hard fight. One of those fights to see whose got the biggest heart, well Holmes has been tested and proved. Wlad????
            No you are right Holmes was no Corrie Sanders he was much much better, better than Wlad too.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by street bully View Post
              Larry Holmes is a top 5 HW all times. He is better than Wlad in every way.
              Co sign.

              Holmes would've mauled Wladdy.

              Different class altogether.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                That's a beard.....you're Tunney's alt and you only like Eastern-Euros.

                Poet
                What is a Tunney's alt??

                Comment


                • holmes makes wlad his ***** and knocks him out. half the time someone steps up to wlad and acctually try to win they put him on his ass.

                  holmes has way too much skills and mentall tougness for wlad.

                  the two dont even belong in the same sentence.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by #1Assassin View Post
                    holmes makes wlad his ***** and knocks him out. half the time someone steps up to wlad and acctually try to win they put him on his ass.

                    holmes has way too much skills and mentall tougness for wlad.

                    the two dont even belong in the same sentence.
                    More BS. Fresh BS for sale anybody?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                      Anyone who thinks Wlad is a great Heavyweight is either:

                      A. ******

                      B. A nuthugging Fan-boi

                      C. A Slavic Supremacist

                      D. All Of The Above

                      Anyone believing something so self-evidently false inevitably will fit into one of those catagories.
                      Not necessarily at all.

                      That's just how you console yourself when someone's opinion differs, or is nuanced somewhat, from yours.

                      They disagreed with you, so they must be intellectually inferior or prejudiced in some way - this conceit makes you feel better about them not agreeing with you.

                      It's too much of a challenge to meet someone halfway, open your mind to actual debate and be prepared to have your own perspective not necessarily changed per se but broadened. And so you contrive a reason to declare their point of view worthless. It's the only way you can deal.


                      I didn't see him do anything more than express an opinion and attempt to support it based on his view of the nuances behind 2 fighters' win-loss statistics. There was stuff you could disagree with, sure, but nothing outrageous enough to engender the tone you took in response.
                      You didn't qualify your argument against his especially, all you really offered was a serious of jibes topped off with a snide allegation of racism at a poster who has never shown any indication of racial bias on this forum whatsoever.





                      Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                      But hey, seeing as your a self-admitted Communist I don't expect you to possess any real analytical power.....After all, if you had any intelligence you wouldn't be a Red.

                      Poet
                      See, you just did it again.

                      What analytical powers are you exhibiting by idly sweeping participants in a discourse into default categories just because you're too much of a jaded ass to address them as individuals or consider there might be something you could take from another poster's differing viewpoint?


                      I'll tell you - nil. You're just being a lazy, arrogant prick.



                      So, while there may be a few knuckle-headed Klitschko supports trolling around the internet, in this instance (and many others FWIW), you're the ignorant, deluded one.


                      There's my analysis.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP