I might be known to bash Cotto on these forums from time to time, but this article and writer is simply idiotic.
I scored it 115-112 for Cotto.
This dumbarse is saying Cotto is damaged goods now? How about if it wasn't for that fookin cut he would have won by a very wide margin, showing he is still at the top of his game.
I scored it 115-112 for Cotto.
This dumbarse is saying Cotto is damaged goods now? How about if it wasn't for that fookin cut he would have won by a very wide margin, showing he is still at the top of his game.
Comment