Better resume? Calzaghe or Marquez?

[#1Assassin]

hahahaha, what a ****head! id say calzaghe would spark you out with his "slap".

here we go..

when ppl who know little about boxing run out of intellignt things to say they go with the "he could beat your ass" logic. all that proves is that your opinion shouldnt be respected.

[#1Assassin]

well the ref was allowing his dirty tactics all night long if u didnt notice.if he was winning so ciomfortably why did he fake a low blow?

had he faked a low blow it was probably cuz he was tired, which he was. if u ever been in the ring u would know no matter how many point your up, if u get tired u still need to rest.

thats all irrelevant though since ive seen the low blow, and it was nothing fake about it. it wasnt a clean low blow, it landed on the top of the cup. but if u ever took one u would know it still hurts. plus freddy roach says the punch knocked hopkins' cup of, he would have to do a hell of a job faking that.

[shade darkar]

here we go..

when ppl who know little about boxing run out of intellignt things to say they go with the "he could beat your ass" logic. all that proves is that your opinion shouldnt be respected.

practice what you preach. when you come up with some intelligent comments, you will be entitled to bash mine, but seen as tho ur dismissing everything calzaghe has ever done (by your comment saying marquez's loss to john is better than any win calzaghe has had) just goes to show your either a bitter hopkins fan, or just a bitter ****. you choose.

[The_Demon]

had he faked a low blow it was probably cuz he was tired, which he was. if u ever been in the ring u would know no matter how many point your up, if u get tired u still need to rest.

thats all irrelevant though since ive seen the low blow, and it was nothing fake about it. it wasnt a clean low blow, it landed on the top of the cup. but if u ever took one u would know it still hurts. plus freddy roach says the punch knocked hopkins' cup of, he would have to do a hell of a job faking that.

hopkins was 2 negative to win that fight,he under-estimated calzaghe and how we would adpat,he got outworked and outhustled from round 4 onwards-sorry to break it 2 ya

[#1Assassin]

hopkins was 2 negative to win that fight,he under-estimated calzaghe and how we would adpat,he got outworked and outhustled from round 4 onwards-sorry to break it 2 ya

thats your opinion. i disagree.

and i have a feeling joe didnt think he won that fight too. all his career he pretty much never smack talked, but after the hopkins fight for some reason he couldnt stop. if he thought he beat hopkins that would surely have been enough. but it seems like he knows hopkins got the better of him and he cant stand it. at the same time he didnt want any part of a rematch.. this is just speculation though

[The_Demon]

thats your opinion. i disagree.

and i have a feeling joe didnt think he won that fight too. all his career he pretty much never smack talked, but after the hopkins fight for some reason he couldnt stop. if he thought he beat hopkins that would surely have been enough. but it seems like he knows hopkins got the better of him and he cant stand it. at the same time he didnt want any part of a rematch.. this is just speculation though

its a bad style match-up and the first fight was terrible to watch.he beat him once,once is enough.he did his own thing in the ring and stalked hopkins all night and he won,so you can disagree but u r wrong

[#1Assassin]

practice what you preach. when you come up with some intelligent comments, you will be entitled to bash mine, but seen as tho ur dismissing everything calzaghe has ever done (by your comment saying marquez's loss to john is better than any win calzaghe has had) just goes to show your either a bitter hopkins fan, or just a bitter ****. you choose.

have u seen marquez' fight with chris john? ever occured maybe i thought marquez won that fight? thats not the point though, the point is im really not a hater of any fighter. joe is a great talent, obviously. but i just dont think his resume holds up against marquez. joe was to obsessed with staying undefeated he didnt take the hard fights u need to be a legend. hopkins is the only top world class fighter he ever fought and i think he lost. i dont know what supposably makes me bitter.

[shade darkar]

thats your opinion. i disagree.

and i have a feeling joe didnt think he won that fight too. all his career he pretty much never smack talked, but after the hopkins fight for some reason he couldnt stop. if he thought he beat hopkins that would surely have been enough. but it seems like he knows hopkins got the better of him and he cant stand it. at the same time he didnt want any part of a rematch.. this is just speculation though

how could he know hopkins got the better of him when he has a win over hopkins! isnt it time to accept the fact that hopkins got a beat by a white man?

[boojee]

both their resumes are crap. Calzaghe is a Marciano wanna be, but his resume is garbage and he doesn't even know it.

Marquez is a good win for Pac, but his resume is crap. Beaten by old and shot barrera, pummeled by Pac twice, beaten by Chris john. JMM's most "notable" win was over old and shot casamayor, and a the squeamish juan diaz scared of hos own blood that when he gets cut it's all over.

[#1Assassin]

its a bad style match-up and the first fight was terrible to watch.he beat him once,once is enough.he did his own thing in the ring and stalked hopkins all night and he won,so you can disagree but u r wrong

alot of ppl agrees with me man. this isnt like me and hopkins against everyone else. its officially a controversial fight who9 many think hopkins won. joe has a controversial "win" over hopkins, thats the best im gon give u.