Better resume? Calzaghe or Marquez?

[The_Demon]

alot of ppl agrees with me man. this isnt like me and hopkins against everyone else. its officially a controversial fight who9 many think hopkins won. joe has a controversial "win" over hopkins, thats the best im gon give u.

no,its the best you can give me-because calzaghe got the right decision.and even hopkins admits that was the toughest fight of his career

[#1Assassin]

how could he know hopkins got the better of him when he has a win over hopkins! isnt it time to accept the fact that hopkins got a beat by a white man?

he got the DECISION. joe could very well feel he didnt deserve it. like ray leonard knows (and says) he didnt deserve a draw with hearns in their second fight.

dont mistake getting a decision with acctually winning in pro boxing. never mind this fight, just in general.

as for joe being white i couldnt care less. im mulatto myself, my mom is white so i couldnt care less what race someone is. i just think hopkins deserved the decision.

[shade darkar]

have u seen marquez' fight with chris john? ever occured maybe i thought marquez won that fight? thats not the point though, the point is im really not a hater of any fighter. joe is a great talent, obviously. but i just dont think his resume holds up against marquez. joe was to obsessed with staying undefeated he didnt take the hard fights u need to be a legend. hopkins is the only top world class fighter he ever fought and i think he lost. i dont know what supposably makes me bitter.

yes i seen the fight. it occured but i like to focus on the facts. he didnt take the hard fights? whoo should he have fought then? the fact is simple, against hopkins, he came to america(didnt have to) he beat hopkins, pound for pound number 3. but if you look above that at number 1 and 2 p4p, did you see a super middleweight there or a light heavy? so technically he did fight the best. you think calzaghe lost to hopkins, your allowed your opinion, but the record books will always say otherwise.

[#1Assassin]

no,its the best you can give me-because calzaghe got the right decision.and even hopkins admits that was the toughest fight of his career

lol. u can say your right and i can say im right all f.ucking day. lets just agree to disagree. two ppl disagreeing with who won a controvesrial fight does happen u know, so lets just leave it at that.

joe gave him a hell of a fight thats for sure. hopkins gave him one right back though, dropped him on his ass, broke his nose, hurt him 3-4 times.

[shade darkar]

alot of ppl agrees with me man. this isnt like me and hopkins against everyone else. its officially a controversial fight who9 many think hopkins won. joe has a controversial "win" over hopkins, thats the best im gon give u.

your opinion but not what most people think actually! unless your asking somebodys opinion who spent that night in a romanian jail or something! controversial win is more like castillo mayweather 1. that was controversial. hopkins was simply outworked by calzaghe.

[The_Demon]

lol. u can say your right and i can say im right all f.ucking day. lets just agree to disagree. two ppl disagreeing with who won a controvesrial fight does happen u know, so lets just leave it at that.

joe gave him a hell of a fight thats for sure. hopkins gave him one right back though, dropped him on his ass, broke his nose, hurt him 3-4 times.

ye hopkins hit him with a few right hands,and that was about it.but whatever ur a hater there is no point in trying to talk sense into you so il just let u think ur right so u feel ok

[#1Assassin]

yes i seen the fight. it occured but i like to focus on the facts. he didnt take the hard fights? whoo should he have fought then? the fact is simple, against hopkins, he came to america(didnt have to) he beat hopkins, pound for pound number 3. but if you look above that at number 1 and 2 p4p, did you see a super middleweight there or a light heavy? so technically he did fight the best. you think calzaghe lost to hopkins, your allowed your opinion, but the record books will always say otherwise.

the record book say alot of things that arent really correct, but lets just agree to disagree.

joe shoudlve left wales about 5 years earlier (atleast). fought roy n hopkins in their primes. maybe fought toney back in the 90s when he held a belt at 168. he shouldve fought dawson.. thats the type of fights he shouldve had.

[#1Assassin]

your opinion but not what most people think actually! unless your asking somebodys opinion who spent that night in a romanian jail or something! controversial win is more like castillo mayweather 1. that was controversial. hopkins was simply outworked by calzaghe.

both were controversial, the diffrence is mayweather gave castillo a rematch and showed who was the better fighter. calzaghe never did. and again u can say joe showed he was the better fighter in the first fight, but i disagree. and we will simply ahve to agree to disagree.

[The_Demon]

the record book say alot of things that arent really correct, but lets just agree to disagree.

joe shoudlve left wales about 5 years earlier (atleast). fought roy n hopkins in their primes. maybe fought toney back in the 90s when he held a belt at 168. he shouldve fought dawson.. thats the type of fights he shouldve had.

haha so u r a hater.well done,have you copy and pasted that from another thread by any chance?

[shade darkar]

the record book say alot of things that arent really correct, but lets just agree to disagree.

joe shoudlve left wales about 5 years earlier (atleast). fought roy n hopkins in their primes. maybe fought toney back in the 90s when he held a belt at 168. he shouldve fought dawson.. thats the type of fights he shouldve had.

ok, il agree to disagree.

why should joe have left 5 years earlier??he was the champ. should floyd mayweather fight somewhere other than las vegas then? i find it hilarious when people say fight hopkins in his prime when they have him p4p number 3. dont even start with dawson.