Originally posted by D0WNG0ESFRAZIER
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather: I was ready to give Hatton a rematch after Marquez and then Retire!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR View Post***** move like always.
Lol at the hit list jajajajajajaj!!!!!!
Dude is a straight up clown!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If Hatton won that fight would he not deserve a chance to avenge the only loss of his career? Was Forrest a ***** for giving Shane a rematch, Forrest dominated the first fight, what about Winky? How about Shane giving Vargas a rematch?
After the fact you can critisize because of what happeaned but this is all based on IF Hatton won, which did not happean.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostPlease point out in this article where is says the word retirement or what Floyd's plans would be after Hatton (and not about Hatton retiring).
If Hatton won that fight would he not deserve a chance to avenge the only loss of his career? Was Forrest a ***** for giving Shane a rematch, Forrest dominated the first fight, what about Winky? How about Shane giving Vargas a rematch?
After the fact you can critisize because of what happeaned but this is all based on IF Hatton won, which did not happean.
The issue is Floyd saying Hatton should have retired after he beat him, that he was never the same. If that's his mentality he should never have bothered talking rematch.
Ofcourse now that Pac KO's Hatton in 2, now it's because Floyd already finished Hatton. So either Floyd finished him and wanted a rematch knowing hatton was done & to steal some more money so to speak - which is hypocrisy since he said he's coming back for legacy.
Or, He legitimately feels Hatton was suppose to beat Pac and was setting up a rematch of a guy he had already ko'd, and since pac beat him now he must have been done when floyd finished him.
there is no option c here. either choice there's some hypocrisy. both options would prevent pac from getting credit, which is not fair.
Comment
-
Originally posted by elmalo28 View PostWho gives a **** if he said retirement or not. floyd is 32 years old and retired before. what makes anyone think he will keep on fighting after jmm and then pac. only delousional idiots.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sandyvahra View PostHe would totally deserve a rematch. That's not the issue.
The issue is Floyd saying Hatton should have retired after he beat him, that he was never the same. If that's his mentality he should never have bothered talking rematch.
Ofcourse now that Pac KO's Hatton in 2, now it's because Floyd already finished Hatton. So either Floyd finished him and wanted a rematch knowing hatton was done & to steal some more money so to speak - which is hypocrisy since he said he's coming back for legacy.
Or, He legitimately feels Hatton was suppose to beat Pac and was setting up a rematch of a guy he had already ko'd, and since pac beat him now he must have been done when i finished him.
there is no option c here. either choice there's some hypocrisy.
This is fight hype, I really do not put much stock in Floyd's words. Floyd was playing to the audience infront of him.
In boxing is a business, it is much to risky to be messing around (you can be seriously injured or worse in the ring easily). To me if Hatton won of course Floyd would fight Hatton, it is easy money.
None of the stuff Floyd does bothers me at all, I like him strictly for what he does in the ring (and a couple other things like his dedication to his craft and his fitness, also I like how Floyd got over on Bob Arum because very few fighters can say they did that and I find it funny that someone most consider a ****** really outsmarted the Harvard man).
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostThis is fight hype, I really do not put much stock in Floyd's words. Floyd was playing to the audience infront of him.
In boxing is a business, it is much to risky to be messing around (you can be seriously injured or worse in the ring easily). To me if Hatton won of course Floyd would fight Hatton, it is easy money.
None of the stuff Floyd does bothers me at all, I like him strictly for what he does in the ring (and a couple other things like his dedication to his craft and his fitness, also I like how Floyd got over on Bob Arum because very few fighters can say they did that and I find it funny that someone most consider a ****** really outsmarted the Harvard man).
Comment
-
Originally posted by sandyvahra View PostAgree again, All im saying is it's quite clear floyd's motto is low risk high reward. it's fine from a business standpoint & makes sense. From a fan's perspective it sucks.
Comment
-
floyd is a straight GAY!
ahaha! he had beaten hatton. then pac beat hatton. pbf makes point how a
hatton is never been a good fighter until he beats him. then suddenly he will
fight hatton again for money then retires!
what about WW? your the champion. your fighting midget guys now.
cotto is waiting as well as mosley.
a complete gay clown! ahahaha!
what worthless piece of *****!
what about mosley with 5 loses and dont have ppv crowd and why the hell
fighting judah, gatti, baldomir, mitchell and ODLH these guys has several
loses too. baldomir v pbf gains 300k ppv. what a big moron pbf is.
all those mayweather who hugs his ball. is this your hero? ahaha!
PBF fails! and always fails.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostEverybody in boxing is about High reward Low risk, it is all about if they can pull the wool over people eyes and convince them otherwise.
Comment
Comment