Roach Wants Pacquiao vs Mayweather-Marquez Winner
Collapse
-
Again....using your logic, one could make the same argument about Floyd struggling with Castillo.Or maybe it was because Mayweather went into the fight injured.
Im not putting down either Castillo or Diaz. But Floyd easily beat Castillo the second time around. You can't change the fact that Marquez stuggled mightily against the first tough, prime fighter he fought after moving up.
Now you want to change it to fit your agenda by saying Floyd was hurt. He may have been but he still struggled.
Not buying it.Comment
-
Of course its about money.Man, you must have missed every other post I wrote in this thread. ITS ABOUT MONEY. This isn't about Floyds legacy or anything else. IT'S MONEY. This has been my problem with Floyd, his ego, his lies, and the suckers who defend him like worker bee's protecting the queen. It doesn't matter that Marquez called him out. Its not the best fight he could have pursued for a comeback fight. But it is the most profitable. Especially considering it will lead right to Pacquiao. That ain't hatin, thats 100% truth.
Thats why its rediculous to expect Floyd to take 35%. Him turning it down for 35% doesnt mean he has a big ego it means hes smart.
I know Mayweather has a big ego but 35% is ******ed.Comment
-
Heres your question again the first time.Oh wait....you mean where he moved up to lightweight and struggled with Jaun Diaz? The same Diaz who was taken to school by Nate Campbell? That one? But now you think jumping even higher in weight against an even better fighter is a good idea? Brilliant.....just brilliant!!
And my question still remains.....when did Marquez get use to fighting guys who have been competing against bigger, stronger fighters? We know Floyd is use to it regardless of weight. So when did Marquez suddenly find this ability to fight guys who have been competing at higher weights? Sorry "Armchair" game, set, match.
Here was my answer.
Oh I dunno ,how about his last 2 fights where he moved up in weight?
Again, perfect example of a person changing the story to fit their agenda.Comment
-
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Horus;5310020]Oh man. hahahahahahYou didnt address my post at all..you just poke at it.. and rewrote what your argument was with rob...
My view of you is that you are being a hypocrite complaining about weight disadvantages when your favorite fighter is miguel cotto.
for example.
I would be a hypocrite if I made a argument against Manny Pacquiao only claim to fame is manny up in weight classes and capturing lineal titles.
in 4 weight classes...
When My favorite fighter claim to fame is the same thing.
So once again.
i find it ironic that you have a problem about naturally bigger fighters fighting naturally smaller men when your favorite fighter Miguel Cotto has been doing this his entire career.
period. There is no dis*****g this point i just made.
You are being a hypocrite.
because your favorite fighter is notorious for being the naturally bigger fighters fighting naturally smaller men.
do you also think a fight between Zab Judah and Corey spinks would be unfair now since Zab is at 140 and spinks is at 154??
you forget Mayweather fought 27 out of his 39 fights at Superfeatherweight.
JMM fought 90% of his fights at featherweight.
It is no way around you being a hypocrite on this subject.
when your favorite fighter is miguel cottoComment
-
The problem I had was you saying its his ego that would cause him to turn it down.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment