Originally posted by The 5* General
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Roach wanted to fight Floyd ion his comeback fight vs. Pac........***** MOVE!!!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by sandyvahra View PostIn a sentence, LESS than it took Leonard after a 3 year layoff, 2nd fight in 5 years, risking going blind, going up 2 divisions to fight the beast that was Hagler. Far less. That's not even close to the equivalent of floyd going up and fighting pwill at 160. THINK ABOUT THAT. Go do your homework on the sport son, you've proven your ignorance.damnn bro that was some schooling you did there
Comment
-
Originally posted by El Gallo Negro! View PostI'm going to entertain this thread simply out of boredom.
What is so different between the number 1 and 2 pound for pound fighter in the world in regards to this apparent "tuneup", you know the same fight Floyd declared isn't a "tuneup"?
Many people feel JMM actually beat Pacquiao at least once.
Is the gap that wide between Pac and JMM who have fought for the most part, 24 very close rounds?
Last I checked, 2 was right behind number 1.
So again, I ask, besides the official outcomes of the fight between Pac and JMM, what is the difference between 1 and 2 and
why is it ok to fight number 2 pound for pound, but not number 1?
Comment
-
Originally posted by El Jesus View PostIf Mayweather were to beat JMM in decisive fashion, the question would HAVE to be raised how well Pac would do against someone who is well above JMM in the skill department and does everything he does better with more power. At that point, the only counterpoint would be "well mayweather is too big", but even then, with pacman showing up at fight time at 148, im one of the few who doesnt think that excuse is going to hold much weight. Just as Mayweathers aura took a hit with pacman stopping 2 of mayweathers previous opponents, this would do the same to pacman.
Comment
-
Originally posted by keio View PostWell-said!!!Originally posted by keio View PostWell-said!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by sandyvahra View PostIn a sentence, LESS than it took Leonard after a 3 year layoff, 2nd fight in 5 years, risking going blind, going up 2 divisions to fight the beast that was Hagler. Far less. That's not even close to the equivalent of floyd going up and fighting pwill at 160. THINK ABOUT THAT. Go do your homework on the sport son, you've proven your ignorance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by keio View PostWell above? I consider JMM a much better counter-puncher than Floyd. Floyd may be faster and more defensively sound, but JMM has the better technique.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El Jesus View Post**** this example. Im serious. **** Ray Leonard doing something WORSE than floyd. Waiting for hagler to slowdown, going into the center of the ring just to announce his retirement, going on intentional layoffs to build fights, man **** that. Then pretending to flurry for 30 seconds of each round and stealing the fight from the rightful winner.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sandyvahra View PostHagler was 32 at the time I believe. I don't agree with Ray's antics outside the ring and what he did to Hagler, that was ******. I'm not debating who won the fight either. I thought Hagler won. I'm talking about the risk he took, im talking about the challenge he took.
Comment
Comment