Mayweather vs. Pavlik or JMM vs. Mayweather. Equally (un)fair?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Hey guys, fuck all the personal arguments. We're all boxing fans and at the end of the day I'm sure we'd all like to talk to fans as knowledgeable on the sport as us in person. I would have a drink and watch a fight with any of you mofos.Comment
-
But I see that you're not gonna budge from that weird stance on weights. So do what you do.Comment
-
I am not saying that the weight in the ring has no significance. All I am saying is that there are no rules for that.Comment
-
LOL. Right here is the exact level of intellect I'm dealing with here.
Awwww, I'm so sorry Tony turned out to be full of **** and a 1 dimensional joke. Clearly this means you must take your Floyd rage out on me. Man you are a sad sad little dork.
Try this: "So it's about belts now"? It was to Tony who's only "legacy" was his joke WBO strap.Comment
-
It doesn't matter what the weigh AFTER the weigh-in. Those weight are unofficial and is strictly speaking irrelevant for the sporting contest at hand.Comment
-
Comment
-
So now Floyd Mayweather fights JMM at 144-145 lbs thereby forcing him to move up 2 full weightclasses.
Wouldn't it be the same as Mayweather fighting Pavlik at 158?
Facts:
Mayweather has fought 5 fights at or above welterweight.
JMM has fought only twice as a lightweight.
Which matchup seems most fair to you or would you consider those fights equally (un)fair?
Apparently DLH v Pac and Pac v Hatton were not fair in your book either, and we saw what happened there.
Stop trying to discredit Floyd for fighting a great fighter and give other guys the pass.Comment
Comment