Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Pac NOW the fighter of the decade?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Maxshayne View Post
    Ricky Hatton punch resistance went down after the Mayweather fight,so Mayweather did soften Hatton up for Pac.And also, Delahoya was a weight drained Zombie in the pac fight so ya`ll giving pac way too much credit.

    I didn`t mention a fading Morales, a bum called Diaz and a highly questionable win and draw against Marquez (i had Marquez winning both fights)Pac has been very lucky throughout his career with all those circumstances attached.


    If Mayweather fought those same opponents with the same circumstance as when Pac fought them, you would never hear the end of all those things i`ve mentioned.
    i don't care who you are, but if you get hit with the shot pac hit hatton with you are going down.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Maxshayne View Post
      So by your logic Cotto and pacman should`nt get any credit for the fighters that they beat that Mayweather already beat.

      You just made yourself look like a fool.
      What is this kid rambling about?


      shoo fly.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by El Gallo Negro! View Post

        Skill level means **** when you're not using it against the best possible competition.


        Fights and actual results do, not fantasy matchups.



        lol, its getting harder by the day for the stans to assemble any kind of defense any more as more and more ex fans jump off the Fraud train.

        "I used to be a Mayweather fan, but......"

        Glad to see you guys come to your senses.
        So now your saying we can't consider a fighters skill level in relation to his legacy unless he fights the absolute best competition?



        Guess Aaron pryor wasnt **** then.

        Comment


        • #74
          Not until he beats Mayweather.

          That win over Hatton last night was a joke.

          Comment


          • #75
            Pac is the type of fighter you'll see once in a lifetime in boxing,hes a throwback like the Leonards and Haglers

            Comment


            • #76
              I have Pac inching ahead as fighter of the decade simply because of Floyd's inactivity due to retirement.

              While Floyd has been retired, Pac has won 4 fights in that time period, retained superfeather title, won lightweight title, and won a light welter title and beating the ****** zombie DLH.

              It's pretty close though. Floyd has some notable wins in the early part of the decade against great fighters but to me Pac has inched ahead now because of his activity.

              Floyd's 1 fight in 2004 doesn't help much either so I give the nod to Pac but if Mayweather can win once or twice this year, I would have him slightly ahead again.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Technical_Skill View Post
                I hope you are not talking about Hatton and de la hoya.

                Because Floyd beat De La hoya at his natural weight class and Pacquiao fought an imposter killing himself to make 147 pounds for the 1st time in years.

                Secondly Hatton was unbeaten when Floyd faced him, many picked hatton to win and floyd gave him a boxing clinic, floyd was the fighter who exposed hatton.
                I knew the excuses would come after that response.

                Comment


                • #78
                  This is some disrespectful ****. Bernard Hopkins should be ahead of Floyd for fighter of the decade, Mayweather is clearly 3rd in this discussion.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Mayweather vs Marquez shouldn't be taken seriously AT ALL. How the hell can you give Mayweather credit for beating a smaller guy. Marquez has no advantages in any department. He doesn't have speed, size, aggression, power, Mayweather can counter punch better, Mayweather has better footwork, Mayweather has better defense. Mayweather has better offense. Mayweather is younger. Mayweather has better stamina. Mayweather is more skilled.

                    Why is anyone taking the Marquez seriously at all? Not only does he not have any advantages going for him but he's also at a disadvantage moving up to a weight class he's never fought in. Should Mayweather get credit for winning this type of fight? Hell no! Just another one of his handpicked opponents...
                    Last edited by ThePunchingBag; 05-03-2009, 04:18 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Demise View Post
                      Not until he beats Mayweather.

                      That win over Hatton last night was a joke.
                      Was Mayweather's win over Hatton a joke too?



                      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP