Can someone explain to me how Hatton is "bigger" than Pacman?

[Motofan]

technically they are both the same height, will be the same walk-in weight fight night... how is Hatton bigger? because he tends to eat a bunch of food and gets fat off-season?

How is it that some people cant understand what naturally bigger means? Im taller then Mike Tyson and could put on muscle to get to his exact weight, yet he would still be naturally bigger then me. Ya dig? If I put on 40 lbs of muscle with my frame it would do nothing but slow me down. I would also still hit like a 180 pound man. Jesus people I would get into detail but some of you seem to have your minds made up that anything that is a negative for Pac simply cannot exist.

[Benny Leonard]

Maybe it's the TV, but Pac's calves look big. His calf measurements are smaller than mine. I weigh more, but his looks more muscular/bigger compared to mine yet his is smaller in measurement. Maybe my bones are just a lot thicker...

[RodBarker]

[

Or fat, Pacquiao is at like 4% body fat.

Yep that too , although I reckon Hatton would have very little fat on him also ,,,, the step in fight weights tell you there is not much between them on fight night .

[them_apples]

Maybe it's the TV, but Pac's calves look big. His calf measurements are smaller than mine. I weigh more, but his looks more muscular/bigger compared to mine yet his is smaller in measurement. Maybe my bones are just a lot thicker...

He's only 5'6 1/2 and he doesn't have an ounce of fat on him, 15' calves would look big on a smaller man. I have 13 1/2 calves and they seem decent sized on me (bigger than Barreras who is the same height as me but only has 12 inch calves), only 5'6. If I had 15's they would look huge.

[J.B.moneY.]

How is it that some people cant understand what naturally bigger means? Im taller then Mike Tyson and could put on muscle to get to his exact weight, yet he would still be naturally bigger then me. Ya dig? If I put on 40 lbs of muscle with my frame it would do nothing but slow me down. I would also still hit like a 180 pound man. Jesus people I would get into detail but some of you seem to have your minds made up that anything that is a negative for Pac simply cannot exist.

co-sign!!! one of the best post i've read today!!!

[Google_It_Bitch]

:lmfao:

[-Kev-]

technically they are both the same height, will be the same walk-in weight fight night... how is Hatton bigger? because he tends to eat a bunch of food and gets fat off-season?

Hatton/ Pacquaio are dead even in size

[tjadl6386]

They look even in size. Hatton is indeed the boxer more accustomed to fighting at 140 thus the basis of him being the bigger man.

[hammerhiem]

Hatton has smaller biceps, chest, neck, wrists, calves, thighs are the same.

the only thing Hatton has on Pacquiao is larger fists. He's not bigger, Pacquiao is stocky to but comes in with less fat.

Hatton isn't taller either, we have seen them side by side and Hatton never has a hieght advantage, he actually looks shorter. I've seen both 5'6 and 5'7 listed for him, considering he's shorter than Mayweather who is 5'7 or 5'8..he's probably 5'6, which is a half inch shorter than Pacquiao.

I'm 5'6 and ricky is taller than me, if i had a digital of the photo with me stood next to him I would post it. He's 5'7 at least.

[hammerhiem]

He's only 5'6 1/2 and he doesn't have an ounce of fat on him, 15' calves would look big on a smaller man. I have 13 1/2 calves and they seem decent sized on me (bigger than Barreras who is the same height as me but only has 12 inch calves), only 5'6. If I had 15's they would look huge.

I have 15" calves... guess I do to much hill walking.