Originally posted by BattlingNelson
View Post
I can dig the practicality of that somewhat. a fight at 170 so no titles are at stake
and Kessler-Dawson certainly is a high risk fight for both
but is this high risk fight a low reward one?
because a Dawson victory adds the name of Kessler to his resume, however will beating Kessler outside his natural weight division mean a whole lot to the boxing purists?
which brings me to the other side of it .. Kessler fighting Dawson is good on 2 fronts for Mikkel, it gives him a big American name (outside of Hopkins Roy Jones and Pavlik, Dawson is one of the bigger names in the 160-175 division)
and on top of the does losing to Dawson at 170 really effect Kessler's overall status too terribly?
because I'd somewhat relate it back to Pavlik's loss at 170 to Hopkins, besides getting bounced from the Pound For Pound top 10 and getting his first loss Kelly losing to B-Hop really didn't hurt his status in the overall boxing world as losing to Hop proved
1. Hopkins is better then Pavlik, which is why he beat him and Kelly can't handle the higher weight which is why right after Pav went right back to 160.
so outside of a good payday, I can see why Dawson wouldn't want to fight the smaller man, at a catchweight
especially when there's better options at 175. (Cloud, Dawson (obligated rematch) or the Johnson rematch)
Comment