David Haye Slams The "Three Fight" Klitschko Deal

[nairbon357]

Hello everyone!

I'm not sure I'm getting the point here. It's not unfair or even new to had a rematch clause in the contract if the champ is defeated. Next, the third fight isn't a bad think! It's a damn gift! Haye got a chance to beat both Klitsch and get all the belts... Haye just got Wlad and Vitali sign in for a fight in one contract!?

Ok, I repeat:
If, only if Haye win the first match, Wlad can take is revenge. If Wlad lose again, Haye got automaticly to Vitali. Simple no?
The champ have is revenge, if he lose, big brother can save the name of the family, if he lose, Haye is the undisputed champ and rule the hw division.
Good deal for both camp.
Now have got to say I cross my fingers so Haye won the first fight so we have some kind of Haye Klitschko trilogy!

[Dave Rado]

I don't know, I didn't read the contract, or the stipulations agreed upon for the clause to be applicable.

I'm sure if Haye gets brutally out-classed, he's not going to be forced to fight them again.

If he loses he'll go back to the back of the queue and will have to fight his way back into contention. There won't be any rematches unless he wins.

[Benny Leonard]

I'll look at the money thing later but if Haye pulls this off with KO's to both Klitschkos, that would be something. First person to knockout both Klitschko brothers.

I like the Klitschko brothers and Haye but I wonder as the fight comes closer if I will end up rooting for the underdog to pull this war out.

[Fulcrum29]

my only contention is why is haye complaining about such a cash cow? he'll make more $$$ fighting klitschkos than anyone else so why complain? it's a win win for him either damn way he looks at it whether he wins or not

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

Hello everyone!

I'm not sure I'm getting the point here. It's not unfair or even new to had a rematch clause in the contract if the champ is defeated. Next, the third fight isn't a bad think! It's a damn gift! Haye got a chance to beat both Klitsch and get all the belts... Haye just got Wlad and Vitali sign in for a fight in one contract!?

Ok, I repeat:
If, only if Haye win the first match, Wlad can take is revenge. If Wlad lose again, Haye got automaticly to Vitali. Simple no?
The champ have is revenge, if he lose, big brother can save the name of the family, if he lose, Haye is the undisputed champ and rule the hw division.
Good deal for both camp.
Now have got to say I cross my fingers so Haye won the first fight so we have some kind of Haye Klitschko trilogy!

Another with the right attitude.

[Dave Rado]

Hello everyone!

I'm not sure I'm getting the point here. It's not unfair or even new to had a rematch clause in the contract if the champ is defeated. Next, the third fight isn't a bad think! It's a damn gift! Haye got a chance to beat both Klitsch and get all the belts...

No, because he would almost certainly be stripped of the belts, because he can't fight any mandatories until after he's fought both defences against both Klitschko brothers. So if he beats Wlad, Povetkin would probably be given his belts, as he's the mandatory.

That's why I think the contract stinks.

[NeXt In Line]

*sniff, sniff* Son, you smell that? What's that?...

I SMELL *****! Is that you Vit?
I SMELL *****! Is that you Wlad?
I SMELL *****! You out your wits?
I SMELL *****! You lost your swag?

Y'ALL NIGGUZ IS *****!

[Mr. Philadel]

Haye signed the paperwork so its a wrap.......the deal is vagina coated but its signed and the scrap is on! Jab....I mean Wlad, IS takin' a risk......what would happen to his image if he gets KTFO by a CW movin' up?!? .....his legacy would be ruined!!

[Dave Rado]

Haye signed the paperwork so its a wrap.......the deal is vagina coated but its signed and the scrap is on! Jab....I mean Wlad, IS takin' a risk......what would happen to his image if he gets KTFO by a CW movin' up?!? .....his legacy would be ruined!!

Yes, but most of his fans don't think he is. A few of them give Haye an outside chance but most of them seem to rate him lower than a journeyman.

Actually if Wlad were to lose in a great fight, his legacy wouldn't be ruined at all. Only if he lost tamely.

[nairbon357]

No, because he would almost certainly be stripped of the belts, because he can't fight any mandatories until after he's fought both defences against both Klitschko brothers. So if he beats Wlad, Povetkin would probably be given his belts, as he's the mandatory.

That's why I think the contract stinks.

Any boxing association will take any of the Klitschko's brothers has mandatory don't you think?