The myth about Chavez-Taylor needs to end

[letsgobrady]

i thought you judge a fight on punches landed not on who's landin the harder punches.

defense
affective aggression
ring generalship
clean punches

[pistol whip]

Dude i'm not saying he did, but the damage Diaz took from Pac is nowhere near as bad. Like i said their is no proof, and most likely he didnt, but i wouldnt be surprised at all if it came out later that he did use plaster.

I just think a normally level headed poster like yourself would find it a little silly to mention plaster and JCC in the same breath.

[pistol whip]

i thought you judge a fight on punches landed not on who's landin the harder punches.

defense
affective aggression
ring generalship
clean punches

What do you think affective aggression and clean punching is?

[Bhopreign]

i thought you judge a fight on punches landed not on who's landin the harder punches.

defense
affective aggression
ring generalship
clean punches

Thats what I always say but nobody agrees with the rules.

[pistol whip]

wow, I seriously cant believe people are accusing Chavez of using plaster, just because Margarito did.

yall might want to watch the fight. Taylor was bleeding from the mouth since the MIDDLE OF THE SECOND ROUND. and he continued landing shots for the remainder of the fight.

the things that people will think of just to discredit a fighter...

Bhop Reign is obviously autistic so you should just ignore him.

[TheGreatA]

Clean, effective punching.

Chavez was clearly more effective although I agree he was behind on the scorecards. It was no shutout though.

The judges had it a split decision in favour of Taylor.

[Steak]

i thought you judge a fight on punches landed not on who's landin the harder punches.

defense
affective aggression
ring generalship
clean punches

those 4 are bull****. you should judge a fight only on who does the most damage per round.
defense is a must in boxing, because it minimixes damage done to you. so its just as important if not more important than offense.
effective aggression? wouldnt aggression be considered effective if youre the one doing more damage to your opponent than he is to you?
ring generalship is basically asking you 'whos winning the fight?'
and clean punches=more damage. so...

[Bhopreign]

those 4 are bull****. you should judge a fight only on who does the most damage per round.
defense is a must in boxing, because it minimixes damage done to you. so its just as important if not more than offense.
effective aggression? wouldnt aggression be considered effective if youre the one doing more damage to your opponent than he is to you?
ring generalship is basically asking you 'whos winning the fight?'
and clean punches=more damage. so...

Then why are those four even there then? It should be done by the rules whether judges actually go by it or not, and not what fans want to see. Boxing is a sport and shouldnt be based on gladiators fighting till the death.

[Rich Loc]

He didnt start doing damage till his wraps got hard in the later rounds just like Marg.

Interesting point

[letsgobrady]

What do you think affective aggression and clean punching is?

clean punching is punches landed there is no hard punch meter so how do i know how hard a punch is.

affective aggression is a fighter that is very aggressive and landing punches while bein an aggressor, you don't have to be landin the harder punches to be the aggressor