SRR vs Money May At WW

[Burner]

Paul. And based on your metaphor, you think Mayweather beats Robinson. A better one-on-one would be Oscar Robinson vs Lebron, or Jordan vs Kobe.

Thees a reason the 100 meter dash keeps getting broken every few years...


The athletes
Diets.
Training.
ARE ALL MORE ADVANCED.

[johncs08]

I see some Mayweather fans and the man himself claim he is the best boxer ever. I am a big Mayweather fan, he's an amazing boxer. However, I think Robinson would have almost killed him at WW. So I wanted to see the general consensus. Mayweather haters don't just troll and bring up bull**** like Cotto or Margarito. **** those guys, nobody cares. This is about SRR vs Money May. Break it down if you aren't a lazy bastard.

damn. floyd would box circles around SRR. todays boxing is better than yesterday. floyd by UD. floyd is just too good. and his defense is impregnable? LMFAO.

[Silencers]

I voted for Mayweather, just for the fun of it.

[TheGreatA]

Mayweather by SD.

[JAB5239]

Thees a reason the 100 meter dash keeps getting broken every few years...


The athletes
Diets.
Training.
ARE ALL MORE ADVANCED.

I'll give you another reason too......the old records don't hit back.

Can anybody prove the best fighters today are faster than their predacessors? No. Can anybody prove the best of today are more skilled than the best of the past? No. And with all these advances in diet and training why do fighters today seem to gas out by 12 when fighters of the past routinely went 15? Why do fighters today only fight 3 times a year compared to 8 and up for many of the past greats? If you say its money, why not make more money then? Fighters today are just as good skillwise as fighters of the past, they just lack the same toughnes and hunger as most of them. There are many contributing factors to this, but the fact still remains.

[KostyaTszyu44]

robinson UD's him

i think he would have kept floyd where he wanted him and thrown lots of looping, but still deadly accurate and hard shots at floyd

he could have trouble with floyds speed early...thats something to think about...but i think ray would have adjusted and won

[talip bin osman]

I'll give you another reason too......the old records don't hit back.

Can anybody prove the best fighters today are faster than their predacessors? No. Can anybody prove the best of today are more skilled than the best of the past? No. And with all these advances in diet and training why do fighters today seem to gas out by 12 when fighters of the past routinely went 15? Why do fighters today only fight 3 times a year compared to 8 and up for many of the past greats? If you say its money, why not make more money then? Fighters today are just as good skillwise as fighters of the past, they just lack the same toughnes and hunger as most of them. There are many contributing factors to this, but the fact still remains.

JAB...

ur d man... i wish i hav more boxing knowledge like u...

[Testdead]

Would be very competitive. And Mayweather would without a doubt be a very live underdog.

I'm not saying Mayweather is greater than Robinson, but if a chain-smoking, womanizing boozehound could manage to beat Robinson, a prime gifted, modern athlete of Mayweather's abilities certainly could as well.

Greatness does not equate to invincibility.

Not at WW he had a record of like 130-1 and beat ATG after ATG.

[FaustoGeraci]

Thees a reason the 100 meter dash keeps getting broken every few years...


The athletes
Diets.
Training.
ARE ALL MORE ADVANCED.

Bull****. Fighters today can't handle one fight every 3 months. It's a hypothetical P4P match-up. It's about skillset and intangibles, not drugs and fitness.

[FaustoGeraci]

Btw...talking in caps does not mean you know a damn thing.