Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Calzaghe vs. Adamek @ CW

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Calzaghe's not good enough!

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by S a m u r a i View Post
      When was the last time Joe lost a fight? I don't want to see some ****-for-brains post "Hopkins!", I mean really lost a fight.
      Doesn't mean he would win this one. A lot of hardcore boxing fans don't only believe Hopkins beat Calzaghe, but Reid and Bika as well...

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by egreezy View Post
        What is it that has some you guys believing Calzaghe could withstand his power for 12 rds?
        Watch the Dawson-Adamek fight. This fight would look very similar.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by egreezy View Post
          Doesn't mean he would win this one. A lot of hardcore boxing fans don't only believe Hopkins beat Calzaghe, but Reid and Bika as well...
          A lot of Calzaghe haters, you mean? Well done for disguising the negative comment as "hardcore boxing fans", though, trying to discredit anyone who doesn't show disrespect for Calzaghe as a casual fan with no knowledge. You're talking about Hopkins fans, not "hardcore boxing fans". No surprise from a Chad Dawson fan, though.

          So... Bika? Are you having a laugh or what man? He lost a WIDE UD, even after using every single trick in the book to foul and steal a decision. have you even watched that fight?

          Reid fight was close, but still clearly 7-5 to JC, at least. Plus Reid got a point taken off for some foul or another. Reid was also offered an instant rematch but turned it down.

          I knew you'd mention Hopkins. You obviously couldnt resist that one.

          The real answer I was looking for is: 19 years ago. Love him or hate him, I don't think Calzaghe knows the meaning of the word "lose".

          So anyway, why not make this fair. Take Adamek down to SMW or light heavy. You think Adamek wins there too?



          100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by egreezy View Post
            Doesn't mean he would win this one. A lot of hardcore boxing fans don't only believe Hopkins beat Calzaghe, but Reid and Bika as well...
            That's true. I don't know about Bika though. Some Calzaghe nuthugger will call you a hater for that though!

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Slater P Persin View Post
              That's true. I don't know about Bika though. Some Calzaghe nuthugger will call you a hater for that though!
              Not necessarily. He is entitled to his opinion.

              You are a Calzaghe hater. You've made that plain. What makes you any better than any nuthugger? Both have views at opposite ends of the spectrum and neither are balanced nor can argue rationally. egreezy at least doesn't communicate like a moron.



              100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

              Comment


              • #67
                Seriously, how ppl can watch Adamek against Dawson and then think he can beat someone with the chin, movement, angles and handspeed of Calzaghe is mind-boggling to me.

                Someone explain to me how Adamek wins this. I don't care if they fight at 2000 pounds, this is a horrible, horrible matchup for Adamek.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by danc1984 View Post
                  Seriously, how ppl can watch Adamek against Dawson and then think he can beat someone with the chin, movement, angles and handspeed of Calzaghe is mind-boggling to me.

                  Someone explain to me how Adamek wins this. I don't care if they fight at 2000 pounds, this is a horrible, horrible matchup for Adamek.
                  The fight would be very different @CW in my opinion Adamek just looks like a better improved fighter since Dawson loss and moving up. And I don't think Calzaghe would be able to do everything in the ring that Dawson did to Adamek. Taller,reach,more pop.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by egreezy View Post
                    The fight would be very different @CW in my opinion Adamek just looks like a better improved fighter since Dawson loss and moving up. And I don't think Calzaghe would be able to do everything in the ring that Dawson did to Adamek. Taller,reach,more pop.
                    Adamek is a tough guy, he just doesn't have the skill to hang with Calzaghe I don't think. I see him doing something very similar to what Dawson did with the exception of getting dropped. Adamek would be walking forward all day, Calzaghe would be throwing those fast little flurries and giving him constant movement. Adamek is not stopping Calzaghe. Calzaghe's chin is too good and Adamek's power is more cumulative than one-punch in nature. Basically, I think Adamek has next to no chance. He can't stop him and he can't win a decision. Kind of makes it tough IMO.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by street bully View Post
                      Calzaghe looked alot softer around his midsection at 175 than he did at 168. Calzaghe doesn't have the muscular build, or the physical strength Hopkins has. I really think he would be pretty fat if he were to go up to above 190. Adamek stops him IMO since he wouldn't be as quick or as imposing at 200 as he is at 175.
                      that dont make sense though dose it because it made no diffrence if he was a bit flabby although i dont think he was at all and Calzaghe beat Hopkins although amazingly one of the judges must have left his glasses at home that day and actualy give it too Hopkins, Calzaghe dosent do any weights so he dosent have that ripped look but he dont have hardley any fat

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP