Calzaghe's not good enough!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Calzaghe vs. Adamek @ CW
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by S a m u r a i View PostWhen was the last time Joe lost a fight? I don't want to see some ****-for-brains post "Hopkins!", I mean really lost a fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by egreezy View PostDoesn't mean he would win this one. A lot of hardcore boxing fans don't only believe Hopkins beat Calzaghe, but Reid and Bika as well...
So... Bika? Are you having a laugh or what man? He lost a WIDE UD, even after using every single trick in the book to foul and steal a decision. have you even watched that fight?
Reid fight was close, but still clearly 7-5 to JC, at least. Plus Reid got a point taken off for some foul or another. Reid was also offered an instant rematch but turned it down.
I knew you'd mention Hopkins. You obviously couldnt resist that one.
The real answer I was looking for is: 19 years ago. Love him or hate him, I don't think Calzaghe knows the meaning of the word "lose".
So anyway, why not make this fair. Take Adamek down to SMW or light heavy. You think Adamek wins there too?
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Slater P Persin View PostThat's true. I don't know about Bika though. Some Calzaghe nuthugger will call you a hater for that though!
You are a Calzaghe hater. You've made that plain. What makes you any better than any nuthugger? Both have views at opposite ends of the spectrum and neither are balanced nor can argue rationally. egreezy at least doesn't communicate like a moron.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
Comment
-
Seriously, how ppl can watch Adamek against Dawson and then think he can beat someone with the chin, movement, angles and handspeed of Calzaghe is mind-boggling to me.
Someone explain to me how Adamek wins this. I don't care if they fight at 2000 pounds, this is a horrible, horrible matchup for Adamek.
Comment
-
Originally posted by danc1984 View PostSeriously, how ppl can watch Adamek against Dawson and then think he can beat someone with the chin, movement, angles and handspeed of Calzaghe is mind-boggling to me.
Someone explain to me how Adamek wins this. I don't care if they fight at 2000 pounds, this is a horrible, horrible matchup for Adamek.
Comment
-
Originally posted by egreezy View PostThe fight would be very different @CW in my opinion Adamek just looks like a better improved fighter since Dawson loss and moving up. And I don't think Calzaghe would be able to do everything in the ring that Dawson did to Adamek. Taller,reach,more pop.
Comment
-
Originally posted by street bully View PostCalzaghe looked alot softer around his midsection at 175 than he did at 168. Calzaghe doesn't have the muscular build, or the physical strength Hopkins has. I really think he would be pretty fat if he were to go up to above 190. Adamek stops him IMO since he wouldn't be as quick or as imposing at 200 as he is at 175.
Comment
Comment