Roach is Not Concerned With Ricky Hatton's Body Attack

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Gambler1981
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 25961
    • 520
    • 774
    • 49,039

    #171
    Originally posted by Dave Rado
    Roach didn't get where he is today by underestimating his opponents or by failing to come up with a plan B when necessary. Take no notice of what he says to hype the fight. Mayweather Snr. is saying Hatton will KO Pac in one round, but everyone knows he doesn't really expect that to happen. It's just to sell tickets.
    He looks at Manny like his son, we will see what happeans though. What he said in this aarticle though is one of the most ignorent things I Have ever seen a trainer say.

    I have never seen Roach come up with a plan b for Manny, he does what he does either it works or it doesn't. He has not needed a plan B in his last 2 fights becauce plan A worked like a charm, the last time he needed a plan B was JMM and to me there was nothing in the plan B folder.

    If plan A works on Hatton he will get killed, if plan A does not work or has limited success Hatton has a real shot, but since Hatton is also one dimensional also this argument can be used against Hatton aswell.

    Mayweather Sr. and Roach are 2 different people, with 2 vastly different style. Mayweather has called Roach a ****ty trainer for years, Roach has to have some pride and want to shut his punk ass up but this can lead to mistakes also.

    Comment

    • strugler
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 6311
      • 101
      • 53
      • 6,632

      #172
      Originally posted by boxinguitarfan
      espn divisional rankings has jmm #1 liteweight pac #2 ,that could change this weekend,
      I was asking for yours p4p, ?

      Comment

      • FaustoGeraci
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 2240
        • 407
        • 536
        • 15,292

        #173
        Originally posted by strugler
        youre really tough, bigman, LMAO,
        So you ask what Williams has done recently, when I am talking about Freddie Roach, and if that was not ****** enough, you follow it up with that?? When did hooked on phonics get a program on here?? Obviously you are some banned loser that I used to son before which is why you brought up Williams. Probably some bitter, disgruntled, Margarito ****rider. Good luck with the medication and the ****tuck.

        Comment

        • Dave Rado
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 8064
          • 266
          • 453
          • 14,460

          #174
          Originally posted by boxinguitarfan
          oops meant division by division lightweights pac rated number 2 as far as pac being number 1 pnd for pound thats ****** dlh lost the last of his six fights and he beat david diaz cmon that makes you number 1 ? obviously numberpnd 4 pnd 1 means the most popular boxer these days,because he isnt the number one fighter wise in the sport no way,****** is your ass.
          No P4P doesn't mean popular, it means how elite a fighter is at their current peak weight, divided by the number of pounds at that weight. Just because you don't like the ratings doesn't mean they are corrupt. Dan Raphael is a highly respected boxing expert. The Ring's ratings are compiled by a very large panel of highly respected boxing experts who do not work for The Ring, and they also rate Pacquiao at #1 in the P4P lists. Your attitude, that if you disagree with the boxing experts, that means they must be corrupt, just shows extreme bias and arrogance. Have some humility. You have a right to your opinions, but try admitting to yourself that just because something is your opinion, that doesn't automatically prove that it is right.

          Comment

          • boxinguitarfan
            Banned
            • Jan 2009
            • 73
            • 3
            • 0
            • 96

            #175
            Originally posted by strugler
            I was asking for yours p4p, ?
            hopkins calzghe id have to say overall pnd for pnds even mosley given his recent performace and dont know theres too many greats right now.im a jmm fan but no i dont rate him #1 pnd for pnd ,

            Comment

            • strugler
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 6311
              • 101
              • 53
              • 6,632

              #176
              Originally posted by FaustoGeraci
              So you ask what Williams has done recently, when I am talking about Freddie Roach, and if that was not ****** enough, you follow it up with that?? When did hooked on phonics get a program on here?? Obviously you are some banned loser that I used to son before which is why you brought up Williams. Probably some bitter, disgruntled, Margarito ****rider. Good luck with the medication and the ****tuck.
              Check me out if im a Margarito or anybodys fanboy,, you sonned someone? theyre definitely losers then. Why so sensitive with williams though? was just asking? didnt say he was a hypejob. you have some self esteem issues.

              Comment

              • strugler
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 6311
                • 101
                • 53
                • 6,632

                #177
                Originally posted by boxinguitarfan
                hopkins calzghe id have to say overall pnd for pnds even mosley given his recent performace and dont know theres too many greats right now.im a jmm fan but no i dont rate him #1 pnd for pnd ,
                ok i respect that, so you have pac at what again?

                Comment

                • Dave Rado
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 8064
                  • 266
                  • 453
                  • 14,460

                  #178
                  Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                  He looks at Manny like his son, we will see what happeans though. What he said in this aarticle though is one of the most ignorent things I Have ever seen a trainer say.

                  I have never seen Roach come up with a plan b for Manny, he does what he does either it works or it doesn't. He has not needed a plan B in his last 2 fights becauce plan A worked like a charm, the last time he needed a plan B was JMM and to me there was nothing in the plan B folder.

                  If plan A works on Hatton he will get killed, if plan A does not work or has limited success Hatton has a real shot, but since Hatton is also one dimensional also this argument can be used against Hatton aswell.

                  Mayweather Sr. and Roach are 2 different people, with 2 vastly different style. Mayweather has called Roach a ****ty trainer for years, Roach has to have some pride and want to shut his punk ass up but this can lead to mistakes also.
                  I agree with what you say, but I think Roach is trash talking because Mayweather Snr is trash talking - I just don't believe that he would underestimate Hatton so badly.

                  It's true that Roach didn't have a plan B against JMM, but I sure he'll try to have one ready for Hatton.

                  Comment

                  • boxinguitarfan
                    Banned
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 73
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    • 96

                    #179
                    Originally posted by Dave Rado
                    No P4P doesn't mean popular, it means how elite a fighter is at their current peak weight, divided by the number of pounds at that weight. Just because you don't like the ratings doesn't mean they are corrupt. Dan Raphael is a highly respected boxing expert. The Ring's ratings are compiled by a very large panel of highly respected boxing experts who do not work for The Ring, and they also rate Pacquiao at #1 in the P4P lists. Your attitude, that if you disagree with the boxing experts, that means they must be corrupt, just shows extreme bias and arrogance. Have some humility. You have a right to your opinions, but try admitting to yourself that just because something is your opinion, that doesn't automatically prove that it is right.
                    that works both ways because whomever deemed pacya ****n luke skywalker isnt necessarily right its their opinions pac exciting and great without question but theres too much salsa on those tacos.your right i should take a more proffesional scientific approach i dissagree with many decisions i should quit hackin on pacya, bias yes arrogance no i dont care how you divide it there is no way pakya number 1 pnd for pnd now thats arrogant, an arrogant ranking,it is what it is im not alone but yes thats history now.......

                    Comment

                    • boxinguitarfan
                      Banned
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 73
                      • 3
                      • 0
                      • 96

                      #180
                      Originally posted by strugler
                      ok i respect that, so you have pac at what again?
                      in there somwhere definitley not number 1 top ten 4sure

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP