Who will be remembered as the better fighter???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sugarshanenas
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 1273
    • 45
    • 50
    • 7,708

    #21
    Sigfried and Roy

    Comment

    • rebmogul
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 1354
      • 34
      • 0
      • 7,718

      #22
      Originally posted by clay123
      Roy Jones Jr or Bernard Hopkins?
      easily rjj

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #23
        HBO saw Roy almost like many see Floyd today, a guy with great talent who isnt fighting the best and whom we are paying a boatload of money to. I think HBO wasnt sad at all when Roy hit the canvas twice. A great talent, who did it his way.

        Comment

        • THE REED
          Sixty Forty
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 43489
          • 1,992
          • 1,483
          • 690,068,075

          #24
          Originally posted by pistol whip
          Most will pick Roy, but when you compare the two Roy always used his great reflexs to win fights and never took the time to master any of boxings fundamentals. While Bernard mastered his fundamentals and is still beating up 27 year old champions at 43. While Roy no longer has amazing handspeed and his technical shortcomings have got him beat up several times over the last 5 years.
          Its not about what you learned and what you didnt... its about what you accomplished in the ring... when you're talking about all time great status.. who did you beat, how long did you reign, how many weight classes, how many belts....

          Not did you learn good boxing fundamentals or not.



          The difference is, Roy sealed his legacy by the time he got KOed in his mid 30's.... Roy has done well in his 20's and early 30's.. bernard did well in his 30's to early 40's...

          Comment

          • THE REED
            Sixty Forty
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 43489
            • 1,992
            • 1,483
            • 690,068,075

            #25
            Originally posted by DarchinyFAN
            Roy, because he did it more effortlessly.

            Hopkins was more of a grinder, even when he was easily winning..
            That also doesnt make ones all-time great status better or worse.... its about your accomplishments...

            Comment

            • THE REED
              Sixty Forty
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2007
              • 43489
              • 1,992
              • 1,483
              • 690,068,075

              #26
              Originally posted by Bhopreign
              HBO saw Roy almost like many see Floyd today, a guy with great talent who isnt fighting the best and whom we are paying a boatload of money to. I think HBO wasnt sad at all when Roy hit the canvas twice. A great talent, who did it his way.
              Yeah they didnt care when they saw one of their house money makers hit the canvas

              Comment

              • street bully
                Tua's daddy.
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 25014
                • 697
                • 263
                • 35,118

                #27
                I'm going to have to go with Bernard Hopkins. They are bothe first ballot HOFers and ATGs. but to me what makes a boxer is how he redefines himself when his natural youth based talents erode, and with Hopkins we saw him change his style to suit his age, while without his superhuman speed Roy Jones could not do much. Based on that, and how well he has been doing when he is so past his prime I will say Hopkins is the greater fighter. But in Roys prime he was simply breath taking.

                Comment

                • !! Shawn
                  !! Shown
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 9810
                  • 670
                  • 724
                  • 31,455

                  #28
                  Roy is the much more talented and versatile fighter, but Nard is the better schooled, but he had to be, he doesn't have a 10th of the athleticism of Roy.

                  Comment

                  • DarchinyFAN
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 2679
                    • 147
                    • 249
                    • 9,208

                    #29
                    Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                    That also doesnt make ones all-time great status better or worse.... its about your accomplishments...
                    It does figure into perception of a fighter. Thats part of what sticks in peoples minds.

                    When you are speaking of accomplishments only the very best names on a resume will stick out, in 20 years unless you are a hardcore boxing fan you think people will remember John David Jackson or Kieth Holmes were very
                    good wins of Hopkins' resume? They will basically remember him for a handfull of fighters he beat De La Hoya, Trinidad and Wright and Pavlik to a lesser extent.
                    Same thing when speaking of Jones. They will only look at the biggest nights of his career, and not look at the totality of his accomplishments.

                    They both have their share of big wins, and one of the things people will have is their memories of how these and their lesser fights were won.

                    Main thing I am saying is that how people percieve these guys and the ease with which they fought will have a bearing on how they are remembered.

                    Comment

                    • street bully
                      Tua's daddy.
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 25014
                      • 697
                      • 263
                      • 35,118

                      #30
                      Originally posted by !! Shawn
                      Roy is the much more talented and versatile fighter, but Nard is the better schooled, but he had to be, he doesn't have a 10th of the athleticism of Roy.
                      Thats why it is so hard to compare the two. You know Ali in his prime was a lot like RJ no one could touch him he was too fast did everything based on speed and athleticism, but what seperates him from Roy Jones is the fact that when age got the better of him he developed his technical skills and his ring smarts to get him the W against younger stronger fighter, and RJ just couldn't do that. On the other hand Hopkins has proven that he can **** with the best of them at 44, which in my book places him just a tad bit over Jones on the ATG list.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP