Can one base a claim to all-time greatness on a ho-hum decision over a 43-year-old Bernard Hopkins and a convincing win over Mikkel Kessler, who's claim to fame is losing to Calzaghe? Probably not.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How is Calzaghe great?
Collapse
-
he is a great SMW
He is a great british fighter
he is a sure fire HoF
He is Not in the top 10 fighters of his generation
he is Not ATG.
I fail to see how being in the 11-20 bracket of your generation and 101-200 bracket All time should somehow make you ****, sorry don't get it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hammerhiem View Posthe is a great SMW
He is a great british fighter
he is a sure fire HoF
He is Not in the top 10 fighters of his generation
he is Not ATG.
I fail to see how being in the 11-20 bracket of your generation and 101-200 bracket All time should somehow make you ****, sorry don't get it.
Comment
-
Best Super Middleweight that ever lived. It is going to e a long time before someone tops him...........
Comment
-
Originally posted by Enemy/Friend View PostBest Super Middleweight that ever lived. It is going to e a long time before someone tops him...........
Comment
-
Calzaghe isn't a great fighter. Just because you are undefeated doesn't mean you are great. He is good but not great. Great fighters go above and beyond and fight the best fighters. Joe didn't fight anyone great till he matched up with a 43 year old and a 40 year old. Far from great.
Comment
Comment