Can one base a claim to all-time greatness on a ho-hum decision over a 43-year-old Bernard Hopkins and a convincing win over Mikkel Kessler, who's claim to fame is losing to Calzaghe? Probably not.
How is Calzaghe great?
Collapse
-
he is a great SMW
He is a great british fighter
he is a sure fire HoF
He is Not in the top 10 fighters of his generation
he is Not ATG.
I fail to see how being in the 11-20 bracket of your generation and 101-200 bracket All time should somehow make you ****, sorry don't get it.Comment
-
Exactly. .he is a great SMW
He is a great british fighter
he is a sure fire HoF
He is Not in the top 10 fighters of his generation
he is Not ATG.
I fail to see how being in the 11-20 bracket of your generation and 101-200 bracket All time should somehow make you ****, sorry don't get it.Comment
-
Best Super Middleweight that ever lived. It is going to e a long time before someone tops him...........Comment
-
Bull****, Jones and Toney were better, Eubank and Benn were as good or better all things equal. Calzaghe is 46-0 but take all the absolute shiyt bums off his record and he's like 5-0 and all 5 of those guys were has beens or never were's...Comment
-
Calzaghe isn't a great fighter. Just because you are undefeated doesn't mean you are great. He is good but not great. Great fighters go above and beyond and fight the best fighters. Joe didn't fight anyone great till he matched up with a 43 year old and a 40 year old. Far from great.Comment
Comment