the most fundamental boxer in this era

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • askoe
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 346
    • 14
    • 12
    • 6,542

    #71
    Chris Byrd

    Comment

    • Cuauhtémoc1520
      Head Mexican in Charge
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 20824
      • 1,666
      • 569
      • 35,996

      #72
      Originally posted by bsrizpac
      Absolutely incorrect. If I as a trainer were to tell any boxer to watch a pro, it would be Bernard Hopkins.

      Awkward? He keeps his stance almost all the time. In fact he's the only boxer I can name as a pro who keeps his ****ing right hand glued to his chin when he jabs.

      Oscar? He's been known to use a swing jab and lead with left hooks. Yeah that's not a good idea to emulate.

      You missunderstood, I never said Hopkins was bad in his form, he does some things great. My point is that he also gives very awkward angles and does some things that is very hard to teach and fundamentally sound.

      Watch old Oscar, he is text book in his delivery of his punches. Especially the left hook, it's a thing of beauty. It's like watching a great formed shooter hit the jump shot.

      Bernard is very good though and has great defense, I just think his level is a 10 and when you are trying to teach young kids to box, I wouldn't start them there.

      Comment

      • mellow_mood
        BORICUA 110%
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 14133
        • 297
        • 614
        • 20,603

        #73
        floyd mayweather, whitaker & calderon

        Comment

        • bsrizpac
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 6837
          • 289
          • 21
          • 7,134

          #74
          Originally posted by cuauhtemoc1496
          You missunderstood, I never said Hopkins was bad in his form, he does some things great. My point is that he also gives very awkward angles and does some things that is very hard to teach and fundamentally sound.

          Watch old Oscar, he is text book in his delivery of his punches. Especially the left hook, it's a thing of beauty. It's like watching a great formed shooter hit the jump shot.

          Bernard is very good though and has great defense, I just think his level is a 10 and when you are trying to teach young kids to box, I wouldn't start them there.
          I wouldn't want anyone trying Oscars pathetic imitation of the shoulder roll or have them watch him and try to throw body shots the way he does. It's really bad form.

          He also wades in a lot, not the best footwork to be imitating.

          But I do agree, his left hook has always been amazing.




          You aren't going to see a pro at that level keeps his hands closer to correct than this....

          Comment

          • cortdawg25
            MR. Marvelous
            • Apr 2006
            • 3603
            • 126
            • 264
            • 10,616

            #75
            i THINK HOPKINS, TRINIDAD HAS VERY GOOD BASIC FUNDAMENTALS. EARLY FLOYD WAS FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND TOO. NOW HE MORE ****Y AND TAKE MORE RISK. BUT I THINK HOPKINS IS 1 OF THE MOST FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND. LENNOX LEWIS WASN'T BAD EITHER, BUT HE DID DROP HIS HANDS AT TIMES.

            Comment

            • bsrizpac
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2004
              • 6837
              • 289
              • 21
              • 7,134

              #76
              Originally posted by cortdawg25
              i THINK HOPKINS, TRINIDAD HAS VERY GOOD BASIC FUNDAMENTALS. EARLY FLOYD WAS FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND TOO. NOW HE MORE ****Y AND TAKE MORE RISK. BUT I THINK HOPKINS IS 1 OF THE MOST FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND. LENNOX LEWIS WASN'T BAD EITHER, BUT HE DID DROP HIS HANDS AT TIMES.
              All pros drop their hands way too much.

              But, again the guys you listed are good examples.

              Lennox had an awesome jab.

              So does Wlad.

              Anyone can learn from watching them.

              One thing i can say is that people should study footwork more:

              Hopkins
              RJJR

              Comment

              • Pugilistic™
                MV3
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2006
                • 9848
                • 324
                • 305
                • 16,773

                #77
                Bernard Hopkins.

                Although he doesn't use his jab when he does it is a good jab.

                Comment

                • Dynamite Kid
                  Slicker than your average
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 20701
                  • 627
                  • 209
                  • 38,291

                  #78
                  Vernon Forrest Boxing 101

                  Comment

                  • Eric Holder
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 4474
                    • 137
                    • 285
                    • 5,404

                    #79
                    Originally posted by BennyST
                    If someone was wanting to learn how to fight properly, then watching Lopez would be the best way to go in my opinion. He was one of the most complete, fundamentally perfect boxers I've ever seen. Yes, that includes Hopkins, Mayweather, Toney, etc etc etc etc.

                    The 'Philly Shell' is not an orthodox fighting style. It is what you would most definitely call an unorthodox style of boxing. People are getting confused with 'The best boxer vs the best fundamental boxer'.

                    Textbook is textbook. It is what you teach a young, new kid coming in to learn how to box well. Throwing lead left hooks and hardly any jabs is about as far from textbook as you can get. If you think Mayweather is textbook then you have not learned what textbook boxing is.

                    Pot-shotting is not textbook. If a trainer tells you to pot-shot as a textbook fighter, you should leave him real quick. Having a lead right as your main weapon is not textbook. If you're a brilliant textbook boxer you're best weapon is your jab, no questions. You might have a great, powerful punch of some type but your most important weapon is the jab and it is what you use most.

                    Also, guys like Mayweather, Hopkins etc do not throw textbook combinations. They do of course, but they are not their signature moves and the ones they use to most effect. Mayweather knocking out N'Dou with three lead rights? About as far from fundamentally sound as you could ask for.

                    Mayweather, Hopkins, Toney, etc have all learned the fundamental, textbook style of fighting but have gone beyond it. If you're thinking they are fundamental you should not be teaching boxing. You will get your poor students KO'd real quick.
                    I agree....

                    Comment

                    • Eric Holder
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 4474
                      • 137
                      • 285
                      • 5,404

                      #80
                      the first names that came to mind where

                      Winky Wright
                      Juan Manuel Marquez
                      Ricardo Lopez


                      and even though he does like to brawl a lot Miguel Cotto can be pretty fundamentaly sound(elbows in, chin down, text book punches, hands up)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP